hi,
I have the same question. For Fe cluster, when I use 3d^6 4s^2 pseudo
potential, the magnetic moment is wrong, but if 3d^7 4s^1, ionic
configuration, all results are right. I don't  know the reason.
For transitional element, ionic configuration PP is necessary?

Yuan SJ


On 8/3/06, eb na <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 Dear Siesta users,

I have a question about transitional element pseudo potential.
I look at some existing transitional element pseudo potentials, all of
them are pseudo generated from an ionic configuration with e.g. +1 or +2.
Why is this so? And should be so or we can generate and use a pseudo from
a neutral configuration?

Best regards,
Ebrahim Nadimi



------------------------------
Yahoo! 360° – Bloggen und Leute treffen. Erstellen Sie jetzt Ihre eigene
Seite – kostenlos!<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=41052/*http://de.360.yahoo.com/>.



Reply via email to