Dear Andrei Postnikov,

I am sorry if my words were confusing. Actually, it is not the matter
of imitating at all. I just wanted to know if having supercell for some
systems like bulk hexagonal helps to get better answers.

I didn't enclose their article to keep it from judgements, but in a
presentation I found from the work they did, I saw the below lines:

Bulk ... (hexagonal system)
SIESTA: TM pseudopotential, ... basis, .... Ry mesh cutoff, LDA
Piezoelectric constant
Berry Phase: e33=... C/m2
Our O(N) method: e33=... C/m2
6×6×2 supercell

Again, I insist, it is not the matter of imitating at all, just wanted
to know if there's a helpful method to get reasonable parameters for
hexagonal systems, especially those which are abit unstable.

I hope to have your valuable response.
Regards,
Catrina



________________________________
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 6:32:02 PM
Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] URGENT (supercell for bulk)

> To all respected siesta users:
>
> Considering
> an article on a hexagonal lattice, written by authors who have worked
> with siesta, I have encountered that they have used 6x6x2 supercell for
> their "bulk" system !!!

Dear Catrina:
if it is really supercell used in their calculation and not just
superc: Internal auxiliary supercell
message, then they should have had a good reason for doing it
(usually, modeling a point defect, ...) and not just bulk?

> I need to know how they have done it to
> generate the appropriate supercell

I'd guess, rather by hand or by using the SuperCell block
(once, and then exporting the generated coordinates in the input file)

> for better optimization for my
> system as well.

I wonder how can supercell help in "better optimization of your system"?

> Please do guide me, it is very urgent for me.

This is difficult for two reasons:
you do not explain what you want to do,
and refer to other peoples' work which you apparently want to imitate,
without giving any details or reference.

Best regards

Andrei Postnikov



      

Reply via email to