Dear SIESTA users,

I have difficulties trying to converge calculation with respect to
PAO.EnergyShift.
The system is 8 layers silicon slab, hydrogenated.
The total energy varies strongly with PAO.EnergyShift parameter:

PAO.EnergyShift      Etot

300 meV              -21007.7361 eV
250 meV              -21012.1582 eV
200 meV              -21017.8688 eV
150 meV              -21019.6457 eV
100 meV              -21022.2932 eV
  75 meV              -21022.4298 eV
  50 meV              -21021.1673 eV
  25 meV              -21020.9682 eV

and for values less than 75 meV Etot begins to growth.
Is this behaviour normal?
Should I choose the PAO.EnergyShift which minimizes Etot?
The change in   Etot vs PAO.EnergyShift is much stronger than when I change
other technical parameters,
for example MeshCutoff. I am afraid  if this can cause large calculation
error in my results?

Regards
Ruslan

Reply via email to