Yes, all p orbitals here are used as polarization states that are empty in the 
ground state of an iron atom. The 3p are included in the core.

Victor


-----Original Message-----
From: Siesta, Self-Consistent DFT LCAO program, http://www.uam.es/siesta on 
behalf of Roberto Veiga
Sent: Thu 1/8/2009 13:31
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] Still energy differences and BSSE corrections
 
Thanks, Victor. In the PAO.Basis bellow, is it 4p instead of 3p? 4p is empty in 
the iron ground state, no?

Roberto



________________________________
From: "Garcia-Suarez, Victor" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 12:51:44 PM
Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] Still energy differences and BSSE corrections

Here you have an example,

%block PAO.Basis
Fe          3
n=4    0       3   P   3
   8.0  0.  0.
n=4    1       3   P   3
   8.0  0.  0.
n=3    2       3   P   3
   8.0  0.  0.
%endblock PAO.Basis

It is not necessary to include TP to reproduce the relative stability of the 
iron phases, TZ is enough. This base was used to check the convergence of the 
total energy with the basis set.

-----Original Message-----
From: Siesta, Self-Consistent DFT LCAO program, http://www.uam.es/siesta on 
behalf of Roberto Veiga
Sent: Wed 1/7/2009 21:10
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] Still energy differences and BSSE corrections

That would be great, really. I did that in this way (for what I called DZP-DZP):

%block PAO.Basis  
Fe         2      
n=4   0   2  P   1 
   0.000      0.000    
n=3   2   2  P   1                  
   0.000      0.000
%endblock PAO.Basis

Then I varied EnergyShift and SplitNorm iteratively within a shell script to 
allow Siesta find the combination of those two parameters that results in the 
minimum energy for the single-atom Fe unit cell. Finally, I saved the generated 
PAO.Basis to be used in other calculations. I do not know neither if that is 
the correct way to generate this DZP-DZP basis set nor if this is the best 
protocol to minimize basis sets.

Roberto



________________________________
From: Oleksandr Voznyy <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2009 7:38:02 PM
Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] Still energy differences and BSSE corrections

Dear Victor,
I knew that one can make more than one polarized orbital but didn't think that 
one might ever need to generate three polarized orbitals per each angular 
momentum.
How do you generate them?

Could you show your basis block to make things more clear?

Sincerely,
Alexander


      

Reply via email to