Dear Siesta User,

I am making some calculation on a slab. I enter a Monkhorst Pack grid
that generates 40 k points and it is suggested to think of
shifting this k-point by the program as the following
lines from the .out file suggest it.
I am a bit puzzled by this k-point shifting. To my knowledge this shift is introduced in a paper of Moreno and Soler. The shifted k-grid should give the same results as the non shifted, is not it? Some earlier test did not show this trend.
Would you follow the recommandation of the out file to add the shift?
I attach the corresponding .fdf file.

Some pieces of the .out file
"siesta: System type = slab

* ProcessorY, Blocksize:    2  24

k-point displ. along   1 input, could be:     0.00    0.50
k-point displ. along   2 input, could be:     0.00    0.50

siesta: k-point coordinates (Bohr**-1) and weights:
siesta:    1   -0.101866    0.000000    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:    2   -0.067911    0.000000    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:    3   -0.033955    0.000000    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:    4    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:    5    0.033955    0.000000    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:    6    0.067911    0.000000    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:    7    0.101866    0.000000    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:    8    0.135822    0.000000    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:    9   -0.101866    0.033955    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   10   -0.067911    0.033955    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   11   -0.033955    0.033955    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   12    0.000000    0.033955    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   13    0.033955    0.033955    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   14    0.067911    0.033955    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   15    0.101866    0.033955    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   16    0.135822    0.033955    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   17   -0.101866    0.067911    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   18   -0.067911    0.067911    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   19   -0.033955    0.067911    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   20    0.000000    0.067911    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   21    0.033955    0.067911    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   22    0.067911    0.067911    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   23    0.101866    0.067911    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   24    0.135822    0.067911    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   25   -0.101866    0.101866    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   26   -0.067911    0.101866    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   27   -0.033955    0.101866    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   28    0.000000    0.101866    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   29    0.033955    0.101866    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   30    0.067911    0.101866    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   31    0.101866    0.101866    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   32    0.135822    0.101866    0.000000       0.031250
siesta:   33   -0.101866    0.135822    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:   34   -0.067911    0.135822    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:   35   -0.033955    0.135822    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:   36    0.000000    0.135822    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:   37    0.033955    0.135822    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:   38    0.067911    0.135822    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:   39    0.101866    0.135822    0.000000       0.015625
siesta:   40    0.135822    0.135822    0.000000       0.015625

siesta: k-grid: Number of k-points =    40
siesta: k-grid: Cutoff (effective) =     7.650 Ang
siesta: k-grid: Supercell and displacements
siesta: k-grid:    8   0   0      0.000
siesta: k-grid:    0   8   0      0.000
siesta: k-grid:    0   0   1      0.000
Naive supercell factors:     3    3    2
"


Regards and thanks in advance for any answer.

Alexandre

Attachment: VVV_3ML.fdf
Description: application/vnd.fdf

Reply via email to