Artem,

Two things could be hindering your calculation. First, your mesh
cutoff is quite low. I would use at least 200 Ry to get only decent
results. In my experience with 300 Ry you get pretty good results for
a graphitic system. Second, I don't see any k-point sampling along the
ribbon length. This definitely could be the cause of your fluctuating
dipole value.

Cheers,

Marcos

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 3:08 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all!
> I am a new user of Siesta and I'm involved in graphene band structure
> calculations. I can not obtain the correct band structure for a graphene
> nanoribon (N=3m+2, armchair passivated by H-atoms). Trying to do that I
> was overwhelmed  with the fact that the system absolutely symmetrical in
> Y-axis (finite size, 5 honeycomb rings) has non-zero dipole moment along
> Y-axix which depends sharply on the Meshcutoff value.
> Could anyone explain me where it comes from? What are the possible sources
> of this "effect" and how it may affect the band structure?
>
> The replica of my .fdf and .out files are attached below.
>
> Thanks for any reasonable help.
>
> From input-file
>
> NumberOfAtoms       26
> NumberOfSpecies     2
>
> %block ChemicalSpeciesLabel
>  1  6  C      # Species index, atomic number, species label
>  2  1  H
> %endblock ChemicalSpeciesLabel
> Meshcutoff     100.00 Ry
> LongOutput T
> WriteDenchar T
> AtomicCoordinatesFormat  Ang
> %block AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies
>  0.00         7.37853644     0.000   1
>  1.42         7.37853644     0.000   1
>  -0.71         6.148780367    0.000   1
>  2.13         6.148780367    0.000   1
>  0.00         4.919024294    0.000   1
>  1.42         4.919024294    0.000   1
>  -0.71         3.68926822     0.000   1
>  2.13         3.68926822     0.000   1
>  0.00         2.459512147    0.000   1
>  1.42         2.459512147    0.000   1
>  -0.71         1.229756073    0.000   1
>  2.13         1.229756073    0.000   1
>  0.00         0.00           0.000   1
>  1.42         0.00           0.000   1
>  -0.71        -1.229756073    0.000   1
>  2.13        -1.229756073    0.000   1
>  0.00        -2.459512147    0.000   1
>  1.42        -2.459512147    0.000   1
>  -0.71        -3.68926822     0.000   1
>  2.13        -3.68926822     0.000   1
>  0.00        -4.919024294    0.000   1
>  1.42        -4.919024294    0.000   1
>  0.00         5.889024294    0.000   2
>  0.00        -5.889024294    0.000   2
>  1.42         5.889024294    0.000   2
>  1.42        -5.889024294    0.000   2
> %endblock AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies
>
> %block PAO.BasisSizes
>   C     DZP
>   H     DZP
> %endblock PAO.BasisSizes
>
> LatticeConstant  2.459512147  Ang
> %block LatticeVectors
>  1.732050808  0.00    0.0
>  0.0          80.0    0.0
>  0.0          0.00    80.0
>
> %endblock LatticeVectors
>
> %block BandLines
> 1   -1.0   0.0  0.0
> 20   0.0   0.0  0.0
> 20   1.0   0.0  0.0
> %endblock BandLines
>
>
> From out-file
>
> siesta: Electric dipole (a.u.)  =    0.000000   17.412033    0.000000
> siesta: Electric dipole (Debye) =    0.000000   44.257004    0.000000
>
>
> Artem Baskin,
> PhD student,
> University of Illinois at Chicago
>
>
>

Responder a