Hi,Ravi

   Thanks!

    Postnikov


2010/6/25 Ravi Agrawal <[email protected]>

> Hi Postnikov,
>
> It is probably because your tolerance is too tight (i.e. 1d-5). Try
> changing it to 1d-4 and you should see faster convergence and your
> calculation should proceed to next step.
>
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Postnikov Andrei
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> >    In my SC calculation, there are always many sc steps like these:
> >
> > siesta:   34    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   35    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   36    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   37    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   38    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   39    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   40    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   41    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   42    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   43    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   44    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   45    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   46    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   47    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   48    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   49    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   50    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   51    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   52    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   53    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   54    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   55    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   56    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   57    -3416.0640    -3416.0639    -3416.0958  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   58    -3416.0640    -3416.0640    -3416.0959  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   59    -3416.0640    -3416.0640    -3416.0959  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   60    -3416.0640    -3416.0640    -3416.0959  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   61    -3416.0640    -3416.0640    -3416.0959  0.0000 -3.9995
> > siesta:   62    -3416.0640    -3416.0640    -3416.0959  0.0000 -3.9995
> >
> > I am confused that the dDmax is zero in so many steps. However, it doest
> not
> > reach convergence. Why?
> >
> > I use the following DM paramteters:
> >
> > DM.MixingWeight       0.05
> > DM.Tolerance          1.d-5
> > DM.NumberPulay         6
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>

Responder a