Dear   Herbert,
Thank you very much for your orientation.
Cheers, Elisa

On Monday, October 04, 2010 01:22:13 pm Herbert Fruchtl wrote:
> Dear Elisa,
> 
> No optimizer can guarantee to find the global minimum. If there is an
> energy barrier between the ones you find with different methods, then the
> optimization will find the one closest (i.e. on the same side of the
> barrier) one to the starting structure.
> 
> If they are very close and there is no barrier between them, it's either
> not fully converged, or there is an error (in the input or the program).
> Note that the default for MD.NumCGsteps (if you use the CG optimizer; I
> don't remember the ones for other methods) is a bit low, so check first if
> it converged.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>    Herbert
> 
> Elisa wrote:
> > Dear Siesta users,
> > 
> > I have optimized a solid made by Aluminum nanoclusters. First I relaxed
> > the atomic coordinates (MD.VaribleCell . false) and, after that, I
> > relaxed the lattice together with the atomic coordinates. Then I
> > obtained an optimized solid.
> > 
> > The problem is that  I did some single point calculations changing the
> > lattice constant in order to obtain the Energy vs Volume graphic.
> > However, I realized that some other structures with different lattice
> > constants are lower in energy than my optimized solid.
> > 
> > Do someone know what can be the reason? What I'm doing wrong?
> > 
> > I appreciate any comment in advance !!
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Elisa Jimenez Izal
> > 
> > 
> > Kimika Fakultatea
> > Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea - University of The Basque Country
> > P.K. 1072, 20080 Donostia
> > Euskal Herria
> > E-mail: [email protected]
> > Phone: +34-943-015341
> > ***********************************************************************

-- 
********************************************************************
Elisa Jimenez Izal
Kimika Fakultatea
Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea - University of The Basque Country
P.K. 1072, 20080 Donostia
Euskal Herria   
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: +34-943-015341
***********************************************************************

Responder a