Have you tried tuning 'DM.MixingWeight' and 'DM.NumberPulay' ?
Best,

2011-02-28 



tauhall 



发件人: loc duong ding 
发送时间: 2011-02-26  07:32:24 
收件人: siesta-l 
抄送: 
主题: [SIESTA-L] fluctuation of energy in optimization process 
 
Dear all,
I am a new user of siesta. I try to use siesta to optimized molecule on the top 
of graphene. However, I have a problem with configuration optimization. 
The energy is fluctuation, that is not smooth reduce. I attach the Energy of 
optimized steps.
 siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33776.8773
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33776.9352
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33776.9810
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.0382
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33776.9230
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.0397
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.0442
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.0603
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.0774
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.0543
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.0788
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.1002
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.0986
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.1054
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.1351
siesta: E_KS(eV) =           -33777.1034
This is my input file: 
SystemName               bilayer-graphene-72-tfsi
SystemLabel              G72T
#Species and Atom
NumberOfSpecies          5
NumberOfAtoms            159
#ChemicalSpeciesLabel
%block ChemicalSpeciesLabel
   1    6     C
   2    7     N
   3    8     O
   4    16    S
   5    9     F
%endblock ChemicalSpeciesLabel
# Basis
PAO.EnergyShift          200 meV
PAO.BasisSize            DZP
#Lattice Information
LatticeConstant          1.0 Ang
#LatticeVectors
%block LatticeVectors
 12.778200000   -7.3775000000    0.00000000
# Atomic coordinates
AtomicCoordinatesFormat     ScaledCartesian
%block AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies
23.45320923         13.58855965         16.37730642    1
25.58232873         14.81751862         16.37072604    1
27.71084039         16.04652041         16.38185762    1
29.83988172         17.27720442         16.37977254    1
19.19150216         11.13037036         16.37722270    1
21.32244584         12.36011162         16.38424376    1
24.87273016         13.58709504         16.36155225    1
25.58372289         12.35970141         16.33168688    1
27.00152025         12.35827450         16.29914305    1
..........
32.18813116          9.68042097         20.75094507    5
30.90013751          8.91478097         19.13337767    5
%endblock AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies
%block kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
 4   0   0   0.000
 0   4   0   0.000
 0   0   1   0.000
%endblock kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
xc.functional            VDW           # Exchange-correlation functional
xc.authors               DRSLL           # Exchange-correlation version
MeshCutoff               180. Ry       # Mesh cutoff. real space mesh
# SCF options
MaxSCFIterations         500           # Maximum number of SCF iter
DM.MixingWeight          0.1           # New DM amount for next SCF cycle
DM.Tolerance             1.d-4 eV        # Tolerance in maximum difference
DM.NumberPulay           3
Diag.DivideAndConquer    .false.
SolutionMethod           diagon        # OrderN or Diagon
ElectronicTemperature    0.1 meV        # Temp. for Fermi smearing
# MD options
MD.TypeOfRun             cg            # Type of dynamics:
MD.NumCGsteps            500           # Number of CG steps for
MD.MaxCGDispl            0.3 Ang       # Maximum atomic displacement
MD.MaxForceTol           0.04 eV/Ang   # Tolerance in the maximum
#MD.TargetPressure        2.0 GPa
#%block MD.TargetStress
# 0.0  0.0  -1.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
#%endblock MD.TargetStress
#OutPutOption
#WriteMDhistory           .true.
#WriteMDXmol              .true.
Could you give some instruction to show this problem? 
I appreciate to all your help. 

Sincerely,
-----------------------------------------------
Loc Duong Dinh
Ms-Ph.D Student
Sungkyunkwan Advanced Institute of Nanotechnology,
Sungkyunkwan University,
Suwon, 440-746, Korea 
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
      

Responder a