first thank you for replying, I have read many papers on calculating the 
optical properties with siesta, such as the paper titled "Ab initio 
calculations of the optical properties of 4-Å-diameter single-walled 
nanotubes". In that paper, it is said that the  first-order time-dependent 
perturbation theory to calculate the dipolar transition matrix elements between 
occupied and
unoccupied single-electron eigenstates, as implemented in SIESTA, but I can not 
find it. in the manual, it is said thatThe optical calculation is performed 
using the approach based on the dipolar transistion matrix elements between 
different eigenfunctions of the self-consistent Hamiltonian. I confused those 
statement. is there any difference between them?
 
在2011-03-04 17:45:07,"Gregorio García Moreno" <[email protected]> 写道:

Hi
I have never used SIESTA to calculate optical properties, but recently have 
accepted a propious work where electronic structure of conducting polymers: 
band diagrams, bandgap, bandwiths, effective mass, ect. All these properties 
are related with optical properties, and the reviewers didn't say anything 
about the methodology (DFT and SIESTA)
I can't help you, but you can look for other works where DFT implemented in 
siesta is used to assess optical properties.
Besides, respect to DFT there are a lot of works which use DFT to calculate 
optical properties of photovoltaic cells, oleds, synthetized dyes, etc.
I think that that all works of nowadays on optical properties use DFT.
I know that Carlo Adamo's group are working in the development of new 
fuctionals to assess optical properties.
Unfortunately, all these functional are not implemented in SIESTA.
On the other hand, there are a lot of scale factors in bibliography to correct 
theoretical values in concordance with experimental ones.

Sorry, I can't help more

Gregorio

El 3/4/2011 9:16 AM, caqhero escribió:
Recently, I used the siesta to calculate the optical properties of CNTs. The 
reviewer ask the method I used. and he say that the Ground-state DFT can not 
accurately describe optical properties. I confuse the method for optical 
calculation in siesta. can any body tell me the details ? how can I reply the 
reviewer ? is it  reliable using the siesta to calculate the optical properties 
? any suggestion is appreciated ! thank you !
 
 



Responder a