Dear Liu,

If I remember correctly the minimum voltage for transiesta is 0.1 V so the
0.02V and 0.05V make no sense (at least the 0.02V is actually calculated at
0V, 0.05V seems to be calculated at 0.1V but still doesn't explain the
strange behavior there).

Another thing, I think you should at least have a SZP basis
for reasonable results.

Regards
Henrik

Den 17 april 2012 09:37 skrev liuyunlong0902 <[email protected]>:

> Dear All,
>          Recently, I used transiesta to calculate some electrical
> properties of graphene under conditions of different doping densities. The
> channel length is 2nm and 8 carbon atoms are used as electrodes. Both the
> channel and electrodes are confirmed in the same doping level. The
> results are shown in the following figure. At bias=0.02V, the current is
> zero, although the doping density is different. When bias is 0.2V or 1.0V,
> the current is almost the same at low doping density. Whereas, if the bias
> is set at 0.05V, I got a current curve increasing with the density at low
> doping level. I also check the output files, both Siesta and Transiesta are
> convergent.  I am confused about which result is more reasonable?
>
> Best Regards,
> Liu
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The input files are attached :
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> SystemName     scat
> SystemLabel    scat
> %block kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
>   200     0       0    0.0
>    0      1       0    0.0
>    0      0       1    0.0
> %endblock kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
> xc.functional           LDA
> xc.authors              CA
> MeshCutoff              200.00000000 Ry
> MaxSCFIterations        1000
> DM.NumberPulay          6
> DM.NumberBroyden        0
> DM.MixingWeight         0.05000000000
> DM.OccupancyTolerance   0.1000000000E-11
> DM.NumberKick           0
> DM.KickMixingWeight     0.5000000000
> DM.Tolerance            0.001
> UseSaveData             T
> MD.NumCGsteps           0
> MD.TypeOfRun            Verlet
> MD.VariableCell         F
> MD.MaxCGDispl           0.2000000000  Bohr
> MD.MaxForceTol          0.05 eV/Ang
> Diag.ParallelOverK      F
> PAO.EnergyShift         0.02 Ry
> PAO.SplitNorm           0.1500000000
> PAO.BasisType           split
> %block PAO.BasisSizes
> C  SZ
> %endblock PAO.BasisSizes
> WriteMullikenPop                0
> WriteBands                      F
> SaveRho                         F
> SaveElectrostaticPotential      F
> SaveTotalPotential              F
> WriteCoorXmol                   T
>
>
> NetCharge = -0.009432 (or -0.09432, -0.0009432 ……)
>
> %block ChemicalSpeciesLabel
> 1  6  C
> %endblock ChemicalSpeciesLabel
> %include SPOSITIONS.fdf
> # Transiesta information
> SolutionMethod Transiesta
> # GENGF OPTIONS
> TS.ComplexContour.Emin        -28 eV
> TS.ComplexContour.NPoles       16
> TS.ComplexContour.NCircle      16
> TS.ComplexContour.NLine        10
> # BIAS OPTIONS
> TS.biasContour.NumPoints       10
> # TS OPTIONS
> TS.Voltage   0.05 eV
> # TBT OPTIONS
> TS.TBT.Emin -2 eV
> TS.TBT.Emax +2 eV
> TS.TBT.NPoints 200
> TS.TBT.NEigen 3
> TS.TBT.Eta        0.000001 Ry
> # Write electrode hamiltonian
> TS.SaveHS   .true.
> TS.SaveLead .true.
> # LEFT ELECTRODE
> TS.HSFileLeft  ./Left-elec.TSHS
> TS.NumUsedAtomsLeft   8
> TS.BufferAtomsLeft    0
> # RIGHT ELECTRODE
> TS.HSFileRight  ./Right-elec.TSHS
> TS.NumUsedAtomsRight  8
> TS.BufferAtomsRight   0
>
>
>
>
>

<<gradoping.PNG>>

Responder a