The fermi energy which you are getting after relaxation is important. You need 
not to worry about the energy which you are getting in the second step.
 
Arun Kumar
Research Scholar
Deptt of Physics
Himachal Pradesh University
Shimla-5
Himachal Pradesh
India


________________________________
 From: seema dogra <[email protected]>
To: siesta-mailing-list <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, 7 July 2012, 19:43
Subject: [SIESTA-L] Fermi Energy
 

Dear users,

I am doing DFT calculations for transition-metal based system with relativistic 
pseudo-potentials. During CG-relaxtion of the system i obtain positive value of 
the fermi enrgy.


----part of output file----
siesta: Program's energy decomposition (eV):
siesta: Ebs     =      -814.545451
siesta: Eions   =      7897.845031
siesta: Ena     =       126.754951
siesta: Ekin    =      9917.297989
siesta: Enl     =     -7300.075992
siesta: DEna    =         0.000001
siesta: DUscf   =        
 0.000000
siesta: DUext   =         0.000000
siesta: Exc     =     -5406.514982
siesta: eta*DQ  =         0.000000
siesta: Emadel  =         0.000000
siesta: Emeta   =         0.000000
siesta: Emolmec =         0.000000
siesta: Ekinion =         0.000000
siesta: Eharris =    -10650.583127
siesta: Etot    =    -10560.383064
siesta: FreeEng =    -10560.383064

siesta: iscf   Eharris(eV)      E_KS(eV)   FreeEng(eV)   dDmax  Ef(eV)
siesta:    1   -10650.5831  
 -10560.3831   -10560.3831  0.9556 -1.9971
timer: Routine,Calls,Time,% = IterSCF        1     250.633  95.50
elaps: Routine,Calls,Wall,% = IterSCF        1     137.026  95.75
siesta:    2   -12585.6441   -10168.7499   -10168.7623 22.8011  4.6040
siesta:    3   -10597.6721   -10559.4861   -10559.4990  0.6524 -1.8012
siesta:    4   -10569.7315   -10560.3855   -10560.4291  0.6058 -3.0550
siesta:    5   -10575.4057   -10561.8761   -10561.9005  0.4121 -3.7528
siesta:    6   -10577.5581   -10565.7618   -10565.7986  0.2409
 -3.8950
siesta:    7   -10574.1949   -10567.2976   -10567.3211  0.1410 -4.2622
siesta:    8   -10574.6241   -10568.5993   -10568.6199  0.1030 -4.0803
siesta:    9   -10574.9700   -10571.8494   -10571.8723  0.0513 -3.9438
siesta:   10   -10575.0707   -10573.3317   -10573.3532  0.0273 -3.8927
siesta:   11   -10575.1674   -10574.8646   -10574.8850  0.0426 -3.8798
siesta:   12   -10575.2081   -10574.8970   -10574.9165  0.0546 -3.8845
siesta:   13   -10575.1596   -10574.9362   -10574.9550  0.0314 -3.8805
siesta:   14   -10575.1357   -10574.9689   -10574.9888  0.0182
 -3.8910
siesta:   15   -10575.1368   -10574.9934   -10575.0135  0.0152 -3.8933
siesta:   16   -10575.1340   -10575.0370   -10575.0569  0.0065 -3.8786
siesta:   17   -10575.1345   -10575.0687   -10575.0888  0.0049 -3.8775
siesta:   18   -10575.1370   -10575.0922   -10575.1122  0.0091 -3.8766
siesta:   19   -10575.1373   -10575.1326   -10575.1526  0.0098 -3.8699
siesta:   20   -10575.1368   -10575.1316   -10575.1514  0.0065 -3.8738
siesta:   21   -10575.1351   -10575.1466   -10575.1665  0.0021 -3.8758
siesta:   22   -10575.1351   -10575.1480   -10575.1679  0.0020
 -3.8748
siesta:   23   -10575.1351   -10575.1478   -10575.1677  0.0038 -3.8743
siesta:   24   -10575.1350   -10575.1496   -10575.1696  0.0020 -3.8755
siesta:   25   -10575.1352   -10575.1471   -10575.1670  0.0019 -3.8765
siesta:   26   -10575.1351   -10575.1462   -10575.1661  0.0012 -3.8753
siesta:   27   -10575.1351   -10575.1438   -10575.1637  0.0016 -3.8754
siesta:   28   -10575.1350   -10575.1421   -10575.1621  0.0011 -3.8759
siesta:   29   -10575.1349   -10575.1403   -10575.1602  0.0007 -3.8757

What can be the possible reason of this problem? 

Thanks

Responder a