Hi Roberto,
I am trying to study how dipole moments of various molecules evolve in time
and when I put in my lattice vectors and constant, like you suggested, for
some
reason SIESTA does not output dipole moment.

So i need to find a way to increase the size of the box by changing
the SIESTA code to change the default of 10% more in each direction to
something else.

Abhishek




On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:43 AM, R.C.Pasianot <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>  Hi Abhishek,
>
>  As far as I understand, for a molecule you can use any (consistent)
>  box size. In particular if you specify "LatticeConstant 1.2 Ang"
>  you get a box 20% larger than putting "LatticeConstant 1.0 Ang" ...
>  right ?.
>  Why should you need to change the code ?.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Roberto
>
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Abhishek Asthana wrote:
>
>  Nick,
>> Thank you for your response.
>> I am trying to study how dipole moments of various molecules evolve in
>> time
>> and when I put in my lattice vectors, like you suggested, for some
>> reason SIESTA does not output dipole moment.
>>
>> So i need to find a way to increase the size of the box by changing
>> the SIESTA code to change the default of 10% more in each direction to
>> something else. Can someone tell me what subroutine to change to do this?
>>
>> Abhishek
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Nick Papior Andersen <
>> [email protected]
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>  What do you mean "10% more". If you specify a cell:
>>> LatticeConstant 1.0 Ang
>>> %block LatticeVectors
>>>   2. 0. 0.
>>>   0. 2. 0.
>>>   0. 0. 2.
>>> %endblock LatticeVectors
>>> AtomicCoordinatesFormat Ang
>>>
>>> it will be 2x2x2 Angstrom^3.
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> 2012/8/21 Abhishek Asthana <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>  Hi!
>>>> SIESTA assumes a box that is 10% more than the maximum coordinate in
>>>> that
>>>> particular direction. If I need to change this so that the box is now
>>>> 20%
>>>> more than the maximum coordinate, which subroutine do I need to change
>>>> for
>>>> this purpose?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Abhishek
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Responder a