Hi Francesco, a couple of quick observations:
 Your meshcutoff is quite low.

 You are working with an insulator, so the number of k-points does not need to 
be excessively large, but are you sure 4x4x4 is sufficient for your purposes?

 Your tolerance is too small, 10-5 may be enough.

 You also mention your a0 is not the equilibrium one but the expt one, yet 
should I assume you are comparing to a planewave code to get your gap? if not, 
to what you are contrasting? You could examine if the gap is smaller as you 
wish when you get the lattice constant in equilibrium.

 Having said the above, the procedure you are following may be risky... I would 
start with a comprehensive study of convergency of meshcutoff, your pao.basis 
parameter, your a0, your k-points. Only when all of those are converged I would 
go for an estimation of the band gap. The idea is to get everything converged 
and then essentially trust your final result (unless the pseudos are off, but 
that would be the last thing to check on your list).

 Hopefully the suggestions are helpful.

 Best regards,
-Salvador

________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Francesco 
Tassone [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 7:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [SIESTA-L] zincblend CdSe bands

Hello, I' m trying to calculate ZB CdSe bands using TM pseudos downloaded from 
the
SIESTA web. I' m doing the calculation at the exp lattice constant of 6.05 A.

I get
1. a large gap around 1.2eV (using standard CA LDA should be 0.7eV),
reducing only a bit by enlarging pao basis (e.g. energyshift to 10meV) ,
so it's not a problem of basis
2. 5 'fake' bands around -8 eV below valence band top at Gamma.
(should be deeper by about 4 eV, guess from Cd d orbitals, and quite flatter)


LatticeConstant    6.05 Ang
%block LatticeVectors
  0.500  0.500  0.000
  0.000  0.500  0.500
  0.500  0.000  0.500
%endblock LatticeVectors

MeshCutoff          100.0 Ry

MaxSCFIterations    50
DM.MixingWeight      0.1
DM.NumberPulay       3
DM.Tolerance         1.d-8

%block kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
   4  0  0  0.
   0  4  0  0.
   0  0  4  0.
%endblock kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack

SolutionMethod       diagon
ElectronicTemperature  25 meV

HELP NEEDED

what am I getting wrong here, TM pseudos should be used with CA-LDA which is 
default, correct ??

PS: everything ok with Si, so I guess it' s not a compilation problem.

Responder a