Dear all,

every time I try to make use of the optical routine of siesta I'm impressed by 
its crawling. If a single scf cycle takes 1 hour, the optical calculation took 
30.9 days!
This is the opposite of what happens in plane-wave codes, where the proportion 
of scf-vs-optical time consumption is the opposite: hours for scf, and minutes 
for optical EPSIMG.

So I'm asking the developers: is there any technical reason for a such 
frustrating slowness of siesta-optical? Is there any space for substantially 
improving this routine?

thank you,
RG

Responder a