Dear Homa If it says the electrodes are not correct, you have to be certain that your coordinates are correct, right now I believe that trunk 427 is correct and your coordinates are not situated in the same coordinates. The trunk 427 provides a check for the coordinates whereas before the updated transiesta version it was not so stringent. Please do a manual check of this before asking us to check your data. I have yet to discover an error about the new version handling the coordinates correct, however, if there is a bug it is very crucial that it gets patched.
Furthermore rars are not a very common archive format in unix, please use the universal zip or tar[.gz|.bz2|...] on unix systems. Kind regards Nick 2012/12/11 homa saeedfiroozeh <[email protected]> > dear all > > Thank you all for your kind advice. when i use new version siesta-trunk > 427 see another error in first step > > The electrodes are not situated in the same coordinates. Please correct. > Stopping Program from Node: 0 > > > but i think my coordinates correct. i run it with version 3.1 easily. if > two version have a big difference in coordinates step? i attach my both > electrode and scattering fdf files. can any body see this error and help me > please? > > best regards homa > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Nick Papior Andersen <[email protected]> > *To:* homa saeedfiroozeh <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:20 AM > *Subject:* Re: [SIESTA-L] transmission spectrum > > If you have used the 3.1 tbtrans version it will have a spin factor > associated. Thus you will see twice what is "expected". You can also see > that every step in the transmission spectrum is of order 2G_0. So my guess > is that you use that version. > > You can try a new version of tbtrans in the development version (see a > mail to the list from yesterday). This will not have this spin factor on > the transport. > > Kind regards Nick > > 2012/12/10 homa saeedfiroozeh <[email protected]> > > > > Dear all trasiesta users; > > > i want to calculate transport for AGN.s but when my calculations finish > see that transmission spectrum is to higher than usual and about 6. > > Who has experience on this problem, will you please share your experience? > > Thanks for your share. > > Yours > homa > > > > > > > > > > >
