http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg05451.html


On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Gomes Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:

> Perhaps you should check if you are really sampling
> the Brillouin zone of the crystal properly.
>
> There is a very good answer about this point on this siesta-list
> written recently by Abraham Hmiel over the title  "defining k path for
> surfaces".
> I understand you are dealing with crystals (and not surfaces) but it is
> worth
> to check it out.
>
> best
>
> C
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 9 June 2013 07:35, neeraj misra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Abraham,
>>
>> it is the real crystal structure of TiGeS3 with 4 units in
>> orthorhombic form. I just took a single unit of TiGeS3 in orthorhombic
>> form to perform the calculations...may be i just took one unit..can it
>> because of this
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Abraham Hmiel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Neeraj,
>>>
>>> We need to see your input .fdf file to make any clear judgment as to
>>> what is happening in your system.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 11:48 PM, neeraj misra 
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would very much appreciate if you could give your expert advice on
>>>> the following.
>>>> "I have taken crystallographic value to calculate the band structure
>>>> and density of states of a crystal. We wish to discuss about BS and DOS of
>>>> crystal.The problem is that  we are getting a  flat region instead of peak
>>>> in the BS which needs to be explained and is attached with this mail for
>>>> your perusal.
>>>> Your help shall be gratefully acknowledged.
>>>> with best regards
>>>>
>>>> QC
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Abraham Hmiel*
>>> Katherine Belz Groves Fellow in Nanoscience
>>> Xue Group, College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering at SUNY Albany
>>> http://abehmiel.net/about
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Responder a