Thanks Gomes
Yes this is how I created my VDW pseudopotentials. I have just tried your H.psf 
and still have ghost states at L=1. Could this be an issue with intel 
compilers? I have even reduced the flags to -O0 but again with no luck.

Steve

Dr S Bailey
Department of Physics
Lancaster University UK
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Tel: +441524592844

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Gomes Rocha
Sent: 28 January 2014 17:39
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [SIESTA-L] vdW

I also had problems in this matter. I do not know if it will help but what I 
did was to take LDA inputs for atom generator and I just changed the flavour of 
the potential to "vw" and generated a new psf file. At least, I got reasonable 
simulations with it. I attached the pseudopotential I used for the hydrogen.
best
C. G. Rocha

On 28 January 2014 15:34, Bailey, Steven 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Siesta users
I have compiled siesta-trunk-453 on intel/13.0. This is of course the serial 
version which I want to test out before implementing openmpi/1.6.5-intel.
I generate DRSLL VDW pseudopotentials in atom and try to run a system of carbon 
with attached hydrogens. Unfortunately the Hvdw.psf always throws up an error 
claiming the detection of ghost states for L=1.
I have tried many variations of rc in the pseudopotential generation with no 
success. I have tried imposing %block PS.KBprojectors projector limits with no 
success.
Eliminating the hydrogen from the system allows the calculation to run and 
gives reasonable binding energies between carbon sheets.
I have tried using the LMKLL functional and interestingly if I accidently leave 
the XC.authors as DRSLL the ghost state error does not appear but the program 
then crashes with references to allocation errors.
Way back I compiled siesta-trunk-3 something using a pgi compiler. Using the 
same pseudopotentials ( generated in the same way in atom) the calculations 
finished and the binding energies were very good. I could well go back to this 
version to try out using the intel/13.0 compiler if I could find it!
Any advice to resolve this problem would be very useful.

Dr S Bailey
Department of Physics
Lancaster University UK
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Tel: +441524592844<tel:%2B441524592844>


Responder a