Thank you! -- Best Regards
邱芳瑜 Chiu Fang Yu 國立成功大學 材料科學與工程學系碩二 MOBILE：0930287221(中華) GMAIL：[email protected] <[email protected]> 2014-11-04 17:07 GMT+08:00 邵德喜 <[email protected]>: > Dear: > > TS.biasContour.Eta just controls the imagionary part. > > > 2014-11-04 11:16 GMT+08:00 joyce79928cc . <[email protected]>: > > Dear: >> >> I have encounter convergence problem in transiesta at larger bias (0.75V) >> >> I have two questions. >> >> First is that, >> I search on the Internet and the mailbox of transiesta and find out that Nick >> Papior Andersen siad: >> >> 'You should check how the convergence is, try to increase the number of >> points on the non-equilibrium contour to increase accuracy. >> You could also start by adding a larger imaginary part and then later >> decrease it while increasing the number of points on the non-equilibrium >> contour.' >> >> >> I know 'increase the number of points on the non-equilibrium contour' is to >> increase the set of TS.biasContour.NumPoints. >> >> but I am wondering how to 'adding a larger imaginary part'? >> >> >> Second is that, >> >> in the mailbox Nick Papior Andersen also mentioned: >> >> 'your bias point resolution is very fine (dE = 0.0053 eV)' >> >> this sentence I thought is according to the sentence said by Alen H >> >> 'using 300 points for the non-equilibrium contour' >> >> so how comes the bias point resolution? >> >> >> hope somebody can help me with the problem. >> >> Thank you! >> >> -- >> Best Regards >> >> 邱芳瑜 Chiu Fang Yu >> 國立成功大學 材料科學與工程學系碩二 >> MOBILE： >> +886 >> 930287221(中華) >> GMAIL：[email protected] <[email protected]> >> >> >> >
