Yes, that could be one.

2015-08-28 16:01 GMT+00:00 azar ostovan <[email protected]>:

> Dear, nick
> you mean the spectral Property  of scattering region don't change any
> more?
>  kind regards
> azar
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Nick Papior <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, that could be one.
>>
>> 2015-08-27 17:15 GMT+02:00 leoqmc . <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Dear Nick,
>>>
>>> you said "output". Such "output" would be the average transmission
>>> function (*. AVTRANS) ?.
>>>
>>> Thank you so much.
>>>
>>> Leone
>>>
>>> 2015-08-25 17:44 GMT-03:00 Nick Papior <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> Please see this slide-show which explains the geometry setup for
>>>> transiesta.
>>>> http://departments.icmab.es/leem/siesta/tlv14/slides12.pdf
>>>>
>>>> 2015-08-25 20:26 GMT+00:00 Jaret Qi <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> I could not understand how the scattering region has to have some
>>>>> parts of the electrodes. If I'm using a pure ZGNRs one cell left/right for
>>>>> the electrodes then how they could be extended to the scattering region?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone <https://yho.com/footer0>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 25, 2015, 1:34:55 PM, Nick Papior wrote:
>>>>> The reason is that you "attach" a truly bulk semi-infinite electrode
>>>>> to your scattering region.
>>>>> When you do this you want the difference between the actual bulk
>>>>> electrode and the scattering region electrode to be minimized.
>>>>> A minimization occurs when the scattering part (non-lead) is fully
>>>>> screened.
>>>>>
>>>>> The number of layers is easily found by converging the number of
>>>>> layers until the output remains unchanged.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-08-25 19:21 GMT+00:00 azar ostovan <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear transiesta users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know it is very common to add some part of the lead into scattering
>>>>>> region, but how much is need?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there any property I could follow to find the best size?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>> Azar
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Kind regards Nick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Kind regards Nick
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kind regards Nick
>>
>
>


-- 
Kind regards Nick

Responder a