Thanks a lot for your valuable comments Dr Nick

But as Rajan pointed out, I am facing the same problem of transiesta
convergence.

Should I use : TS.ReplicateA2Left/Right   to increase my electrode size and
may cause in convergence?

Please comment.

With Regards
Riya

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:33 AM, RAJAN SINGH <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thank you Dr Nick
>
> After doing relaxation from siesta when I am running my transiesta it wont
> converge. The Qto and Qt values are not same. How to achieve that?
>
> Efermi from SIESTA                   :    -3.47054
> Total charge                  [Qt0]  :   414.00000
> Charge in update region       [Qc]   :   133.70127
> Charge outside update region  [Qcn]  :   280.29873
> Left electrode                [L]    :   133.72936
> Left electrode/device         [L-C]  :     3.91751
> Device                        [C]    :   133.70127
> Device/right electrode        [C-R]  :     4.65178
> Right electrode               [R]    :   133.34561
> Other                         [O]    :     4.65448
>
>  Reading GF file, with title:
>    nanoribbon.TSGFL
>  Title: 'Generated GF file'
>
>  Reading GF file, with title:
>    nanoribbon.TSGFR
>  Title: 'Generated GF file'
>
> ts-charge:        O        L      L-C        C      C-R        R       Qt
> ts-charge:    4.654  133.729    3.918  329.548    4.652  133.346  609.847
>
>
> With Regards
> Rajan
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Nick Papior <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Please re-read the slides _carefully_. You should probably not relax the
>> entire device region.
>>
>> This is slightly touched in the slides.
>>
>> 2016-01-19 19:33 GMT+01:00 RAJAN SINGH <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Thank You Prof. Nick.
>>>
>>> I read the slides according to them the steps should be :
>>>
>>> 1. Relax the Device atoms using siesta run (CG run)
>>> 2. After relaxation attach the electrodes.
>>> 3. Again perform the Siesta relaxation (CG run) but this time put a
>>> geometry constraints on electrode atoms.
>>> 4. after step 3 relaxation go for Transiesta Run.
>>>
>>> Is that right?
>>>
>>> Please help me.
>>>
>>> With Regards
>>> Rajan
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Nick Papior <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Check these slides, and see if they will help you (they are a guiding
>>>> example!):
>>>>
>>>> http://departments.icmab.es/leem/siesta/tlv14/slides12.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2016-01-19 19:04 GMT+01:00 RAJAN SINGH <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Siesta Users
>>>>>
>>>>> Kindly give me advice on the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to perform the transiesta calculation on relaxed device
>>>>> structure the procedure which I am performing is:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. First I write a .fdf file (left electrode + Device + right
>>>>> electrode).
>>>>> 2. then I remove my electrode atoms from file (KEEPING THE LATTICE
>>>>> VECTORS AS SAME)
>>>>> 3. Then perform a CG relaxation run.
>>>>> 4. Once the run completed then I modify my .fdf file
>>>>>     (left electrode + RELAXED Device + right electrode)
>>>>> 5. Then perfom the transiesta run.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please tell me whether the above process is appropriate and correct or
>>>>> not. I am really a bit confuse in this step. I really need help in this
>>>>> please help me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank You
>>>>>
>>>>> With Regards
>>>>> Rajan Singh
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Kind regards Nick
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kind regards Nick
>>
>
>

Responder a