Hi Arash,
To visualise the (small) differences you have to plot .VH(V) - .VH(0)
I am not familiar with macroave, but such postprocessing techniques can
be done in plotrho(?) or rho2xsf routines.
For more info: http://www.xcrysden.org/doc/sies2xsf.html
Regards,
Aaron
On 27/04/16 14:04, arash ghafary wrote:
Dear Nick,
I set
TS.Voltage 0.5 eV
but .VH file containts Poential(0)
and by changing TS.Voltage .VH file not changes.
best
arash,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Nick Papior <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
2016-04-27 14:45 GMT+02:00 arash ghafary <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Thanks Nick,
but I can not get potential(V).
You already have it.
1. calculation
TS.Voltage 0 eV
the .VH file contains "Potential(0)"
2. calculation
TS.Voltage 0.5 eV
the .VH file contains "Potential(0.5 V)"
best
Arash,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Nick Papior
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
You need to do:
Potential(V) - Potential(0)
to get the potential drop of the device (I suspect this is
what you request?).
2016-04-27 14:12 GMT+02:00 arash ghafary
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
Dear Transiesta users
How can I get electrostatic potential under finite
bias voltage?
I use
SaveElectrostaicPotential T
with different
TS.Voltage 0.1 (0.2,0.3,...) eV
then use macroave program to convert .VH file to
.macroave file, but answers are similar to 0 volt bias.
what is wrong?
Best wishes,
Arash,
--
Kind regards Nick
--
Kind regards Nick
--
PhD student
B321/28
Aaron Thong
