Let me add that your current simulation does not advocate using k-point
sampling transverse to the transport direction.

1. Why do you have no transverse periodicity?

Also, your converged scattering region is "missing" more than 1 electron.
This tells me that your system is ill-setup, either from a geometrical
point of view, or from a calculation parameter point of view.

2. Check your convergence parameters. I would say your lower energy bound
is too high. You should probably go to -30 eV or even lower.



2016-05-23 12:21 GMT+02:00 Aaron <[email protected]>:

> Hi Raha,
>
> It can be slightly difficult to compare between methods. Are you ensuring
> that the basis set size is the same between DFTB and DFT methods for
> example?
>
> I can suggest either tightening convergence criteria or else increasing
> number of k points. (In the paper linked they used a 4x4 k point grid
> whereas you use gamma point). Averaging over multiple k points would help
> to smear out the spikes.
>
> Regards,
> Aaron
>
>
> On 22/05/16 13:41, Raha khalili wrote:
>
>
> Dear Nick and Aaron,
>
> Many thanks for your reply. Yes, my calculations has converged as you can
> see in my attached output files.
>
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Thong, Aaron <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Raha,
>>
>> How do you define what is correct for your transmission? Are you trying
>> to reproduce a certain literature result?
>>
>
> I am trying to do some calculations on amine-linked single molecular
> junctions with DFTB and I need to compare my results to DFT (the results
> from DFTB are attached). My DFTB transmission is smoother than DFT one and
> I can not compare these two calculations. There also is a DFT calculation
> on a same structure in "PHYSICAL REVIEW B 83, 115108 (2011)" that differs
> from my calculations.
>
> I'm not sure if my Transiesta calculations is correct or not. As first, I
> optimized the attached molecule to electrodes by siesta, then used the
> optimized structure in my Transiesta calculation.
>
> Regards,
> Raha
>
>
>>
>>
>> Spike peaks in transmission is quite common for single molecule junctions
>> since the Dos of these junctions would be spikes.
>>
>> Regards
>> Aaron
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Samsung device
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Raha khalili <[email protected]>
>> Date: 21/05/2016 9:35 pm (GMT+00:00)
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [SIESTA-L] Transmission problem
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I am trying to find the transmission of a single molecule junction by
>> using Transiesta but the final result doesn't seem to be correct with many
>> spike-like peaks.
>>
>> Here are attached my input files and final T results.
>> Any help will be really appreciated.
>>
>> kind regards,
>> Raha
>>
>>
>> --
>> Khadijeh Khalili
>> Nanotechnology group, Physics department, university of Mazandaran
>> Babolsar, Iran
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Khadijeh Khalili
> Nanotechnology group, Physics department, university of Mazandaran
> Babolsar, Iran
>
>
> --
> PhD student
> B321/28
> Aaron Thong
>
>


-- 
Kind regards Nick

Responder a