Dear Dr Nick Sir, If both paths are given which is preferred for lapack n blas during installation?
Regards Anaya On 25 Jun 2017 1:31 a.m., "Nick Papior" <nickpap...@gmail.com> wrote: > You shouldn't need to specify these variables (they are already defined in > COMP_LIBS) > > BLAS_LIBS=libsiestaBLAS.a > > LAPACK_LIBS=libsiestaLAPACK.a > > Otherwise, it looks ok. > > Also, please note that the 4.1 series is a beta release and if using the > beta release series it is imperative to keep using the updated versions > (currently the 4.1-b2 is released, and very soon the 4.1-b3 will be > released). > > See https://launchpad.net/siesta/+milestone/4.1-b3 for release dates. > > 2017-06-22 23:39 GMT+02:00 Ananya Rajpoot <rajpootanaya1...@gmail.com>: > >> Hello Siesta community >> >> I am a new user of Siesta. I recently installed Siesta-4.0 b1 version on >> my cluster. >> >> I am just curious that wether I have used correct arch.make file with >> correct libraries or not, hence I am requesting all of you to please verify >> the same. The arch.make file and library list are given below: >> >> Libraries : >> >> 1. gcc version 4.8.2 >> >> 2. openmpi version gcc64 1.6.5-with-gcc-4.8.2 >> >> 3. scalapack (openmpi/gcc/64/2.0.2) >> >> 4. blas (gcc/64/3.6.0) >> >> 5. blacs (openmpi/gcc/64/1.1patch03) >> >> Arch.make file : >> >> # >> >> # Copyright (C) 1996-2016 The SIESTA group >> >> # This file is distributed under the terms of the >> >> # GNU General Public License: see COPYING in the top directory >> >> # or http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.txt. >> >> # See Docs/Contributors.txt for a list of contributors. >> >> # >> >> .SUFFIXES: >> >> .SUFFIXES: .f .F .o .a .f90 .F90 >> >> SIESTA_ARCH=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu--unknown >> >> CC=mpicc >> >> FPP= >> >> FPP_OUTPUT= >> >> FC=mpif90 >> >> RANLIB=ranlib >> >> SYS=nag >> >> SP_KIND=4 >> >> DP_KIND=8 >> >> KINDS=$(SP_KIND) $(DP_KIND) >> >> FFLAGS=-g -O2 >> >> FPPFLAGS= -DMPI -DFC_HAVE_FLUSH -DFC_HAVE_ABORT >> >> LDFLAGS= >> >> ARFLAGS_EXTRA= >> >> FCFLAGS_fixed_f= >> >> FCFLAGS_free_f90= >> >> FPPFLAGS_fixed_F= >> >> FPPFLAGS_free_F90= >> >> BLAS_LIBS=libsiestaBLAS.a >> >> LAPACK_LIBS=libsiestaLAPACK.a >> >> BLACS_LIBS=/blacs/openmpi/gcc/1.1patch03/lib64/libblacs.a >> >> SCALAPACK_LIBS=/scalapack/openmpi/gcc/2.0.2/lib64/libscalapack.a >> >> COMP_LIBS=libsiestaLAPACK.a libsiestaBLAS.a >> >> NETCDF_LIBS= >> >> NETCDF_INTERFACE= >> >> LIBS=$(SCALAPACK_LIBS) $(BLACS_LIBS) $(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS) >> $(NETCDF_LIBS) >> >> #SIESTA needs an F90 interface to MPI >> >> #This will give you SIESTA's own implementation >> >> #If your compiler vendor offers an alternative, you may change >> >> #to it here. >> >> MPI_INTERFACE=libmpi_f90.a >> >> MPI_INCLUDE=. >> >> #Dependency rules are created by autoconf according to whether >> >> #discrete preprocessing is necessary or not. >> >> .F.o: >> >> $(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $(INCFLAGS) $(FPPFLAGS) $(FPPFLAGS_fixed_F) $< >> >> .F90.o: >> >> $(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $(INCFLAGS) $(FPPFLAGS) $(FPPFLAGS_free_F90) $< >> >> .f.o: >> >> $(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $(INCFLAGS) $(FCFLAGS_fixed_f) $< >> >> .f90.o: >> >> $(FC) -c $(FFLAGS) $(INCFLAGS) $(FCFLAGS_free_f90) $< >> >> Please anyone just verify so that I can proceed furthur. >> >> Thanks to all >> >> Regards >> >> Ananya >> > > > > -- > Kind regards Nick >
