Dear Nick

Thank you for your reply. I will try the latest version. i hope the issue
gets resolved soon .

Regards

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Nick Papior <[email protected]> wrote:

> The tbtrans version shipped with 3.2 is before my knowledge.
>
> So I can't say for that version. I would suggest you to try the tbtrans
> version shipped in 4.0 (or 4.1). If you are not required to use the same
> version for consistency, then I would advice on using 4.0.1 as the latest
> stable release, or 4.1-b3 for the latest features.
>
> 2017-10-12 6:03 GMT+02:00 Farzaneh Farzadi <[email protected]>:
>
>> Dear Nick
>>
>> I work with  version 3.2 . you mean that the problem may be originated
>> from the tbtrans code !
>> interestingly, the spin up data of current is in good agreement with
>> transmission information but the spin down data appears to be completely
>> wrong.
>>
>> best regards
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Nick Papior <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Which version of tbtrans, if you are using the beta release. Then please
>>> use the latest version 4.1-b3.
>>>
>>> 2017-10-10 13:49 GMT+02:00 Farzaneh Farzadi <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> Dear Users
>>>>
>>>> I am studying spin transport of single molecular  junctions by siesta,
>>>> transiesta and tbtrans. recently, i have got into trouble .  when i have
>>>> run my program by tbtrans to obtain I-V curve , my data is not  consistent
>>>> with transmission spectra of that tbtrans run .
>>>>
>>>> for example, for the spin-down case, T(E,V)  represents zero
>>>> transmission coefficient  near the Fermi level over  the entire bias range
>>>> (-0.6 to 0.6 V) whereas  spin-up state shows a  sharp resonance peak at the
>>>> Fermi energy over the same bias range which can result in a half metallic
>>>> property. my serious problem is that why the i-v curve for both spin
>>>> channels has the same value  and does not show any spin polarization.
>>>>
>>>> any suggestions will be really appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Farzadi
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kind regards Nick
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kind regards Nick
>

Responder a