Support this by considering the issue "unsolicited traffic" also thanks for
sharing  the reference.






Regards //  Jahangir


On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Aftab Siddiqui
<[email protected]>wrote:

> In favour of this proposal.
>
> Regards,
>
> Aftab A. Siddiqui
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Skeeve Stevens <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I 100% support this proposal.
>>
>>
>> ...Skeeve
>>
>> *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
>> [email protected] ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
>>
>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>>
>> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
>> linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>>
>> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
>>
>>
>>  The Experts Who The Experts Call
>> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Andy Linton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  Dear SIG members
>>>
>>>  The proposal "prop-109v001: Allocate 1.0.0.0/24 and 1.1.1.0/24 to APNIC
>>> Labs as Research Prefixes" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review. It
>>> will be presented at the Policy SIG at APNIC 37 in Petaling Jaya,
>>> Malaysia, on Thursday, 27 February 2014.
>>>
>>>  We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list
>>> before the meeting.
>>>
>>>  The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an
>>> important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to
>>> express your views on the proposal:
>>>
>>>       - Do you support or oppose this proposal?
>>>      - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so,
>>>        tell the community about your situation.
>>>      - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
>>>      - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
>>>      - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
>>>        effective?
>>>
>>>
>>>  Information about this policy proposals is available from:
>>>
>>>      http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/109
>>>
>>>  Andy, Masato
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> prop-109v001: Allocate 1.0.0.0/24 and 1.1.1.0/24 to APNIC Labs as
>>>               Research Prefixes
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>  Proposer:        Geoff Huston, [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>  1. Problem statement
>>> --------------------
>>>
>>>     Network 1 (1.0.0.0/8) was allocated to APNIC by the IANA on 19
>>>    January 2010. In line with standard practice APNIC's Resource Quality
>>>    Assurance activities determined that 95% of the address space would
>>>    be suitable for delegation as it was found to be relatively free of
>>>    unwanted traffic [1].
>>>
>>>     Testing, conducted by APNIC R&D found that certain blocks within
>>>    Network 1 attract significant amounts of unsolicited incoming
>>>    traffic. [2]
>>>
>>>     Analysis revealed that, prior to any delegations being made from the
>>>    block, 1.0.0.0/8 attracted an average of 140Mbps - 160Mbps of
>>>    incoming traffic as a continuous sustained traffic level, with peak
>>>    bursts of over 800Mbps. This analysis highlighted the individual
>>>    addresses 1.1.1.1 as the single address with the highest level of
>>>    unsolicited traffic, and it was recommended that the covering /24
>>>    prefix, and also 1.1.1.0/24 be withheld from allocation pending a
>>>    decision as to the longer term disposition of these address prefixes.
>>>
>>>     As these addresses attract extremely high levels of unsolicited
>>>    incoming traffic, the blocks have been withheld from allocation and
>>>    periodically checked to determine if the incoming traffic profile has
>>>    altered. None has been observed to date. After four years, it now
>>>    seems unlikely there will ever be any change in the incoming traffic
>>>    profile.
>>>
>>>     This proposal is intended to define a long term approach to the
>>>    management of 1.0.0.0/24 and 1.1.1.0/24.
>>>
>>>
>>>  2. Objective of policy change
>>> -----------------------------
>>>
>>>     The objective of this proposal is to allocate 1.0.0.0/24 and
>>>    1.1.1.0/24 to APNIC Labs, to be used as research prefixes.
>>>
>>>  3. Situation in other regions
>>> -----------------------------
>>>
>>>     Other RIRs (notably the RIPE NCC) have used their policy process to
>>>    review self-allocations of number resources to the RIR as a means of
>>>    ensuring transparency of the address allocation process. This
>>>    proposal is consistent with such a practice.
>>>
>>>
>>>  4. Proposed policy solution
>>> ---------------------------
>>>
>>>     This proposal recommends that the APNIC community agree to allocate
>>>    1.0.0.0/24 and 1.1.1.0/24 to APNIC Labs as research prefixes. The
>>>    intent is to use these prefixes as passive traffic collectors in
>>>    order to generate a long term profile of unsolicited traffic in the
>>>    IPv4 internet that is directed to well known addresses to study
>>>    various aspects of traffic profiles and route scope leakages.
>>>
>>>     An experiment in gathering a profile of unsolicited traffic directed
>>>    at 1.1.1.0/24 was started by APNIC Labs in 2013, in collaboration
>>>    with Google. This experiment was set up as a temporary exercise to
>>>    understand the longer term trend of the traffic profile associated
>>>    with this address. Through this policy proposal we would like to
>>>    place this research experiment on a more certain longer term
>>>    foundation.
>>>
>>>  5. Advantages / Disadvantages
>>> -----------------------------
>>>
>>>  Advantages
>>>
>>>     - It will make use of this otherwise unusable address space.
>>>
>>>     - The research analysis may assist network operators to understand
>>>      the effectiveness of route scoping approaches.
>>>
>>>  Disadvantages
>>>
>>>     - The proposer is unclear what the downsides to this action may be.
>>>      The consideration of this proposal by the community may allow
>>>      potential downsides to be identified.
>>>
>>>
>>>  6. Impact on APNIC
>>> ------------------
>>>
>>>     There are no impacts on APNIC.
>>>
>>>  References
>>> ----------
>>>
>>>     [1] Resource Quality Good for Most of IPv4 Network “1”
>>>    http://www.apnic.net/publications/press/releases/2010/network-1.pdf
>>>
>>>     [2] Traffic in Network 1.0.0.0/8
>>>    http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2010-03/net1.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>>>       *
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>>
>>>
>>
>> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>>     *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
>>
>
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>     *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
>


-- 

*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to