On 2/13/14, 16:44 , Dean Pemberton wrote:
Hi Mike,

I like David's way of handling the issue that you raise.
By saying that "... it is acceptable to filter this prefix at an
administrative boundary, if an operator desires.  Further, it should
be made clear it is not acceptable to advertise this prefix to the
Global Internet."

Glad to be of help. :)

I'm interested in your comment here regarding the IXP situation.
Would 1.2.3.4 being advertised onto an IXP by a willing participant be
something that you'd see a problem with?
It would certainly be possible to place wording into the policy which
places an expectation that operators should filter this at their AS
boundary.  I'm interested in whether people think this would
unreasonably restrict the benefit of some fo the use cases of this
prefix.

I'm not sure you want to completely prescribe an answer here, it should be a local decision for the community or operator of an IXP. Maybe just suggest that IXPs should consider local policy on the issue, especially for peering with the IXP's route server if their is one. For a direct peering across the exchange it should be up to the two peers to decide.

Maybe add a recommendation of ask first as a general rule.

Also, if this turns out to work really well, I'm skeptical of that by the way, and it becomes really popular I could see this as a potential service an IXP could provide its members. But, it is way premature to recommend anything like that.

Dean

--
Dean Pemberton

Technical Policy Advisor
InternetNZ
+64 21 920 363 (mob)
[email protected]

To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.


--
================================================
David Farmer               Email: [email protected]
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to