All the information is in the APRICOT Programme referenced here. https://2014.apricot.net/program#session/66948
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Skeeve Stevens < [email protected]> wrote: > Sweet. Can I get some timezone information for this event please. > > > ...Skeeve > > *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd > [email protected] ; www.eintellegonetworks.com > > Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > > facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve > > twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com > > > The Experts Who The Experts Call > Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Dean Pemberton <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I've just been advised that due to popular demand, this session will >> now be streamed live. >> >> Please ensure that if you would like to watch the stream or >> participate that you register before hand. >> >> There is a registration link on the top of the Programme page >> https://2014.apricot.net/program >> >> >> See you all there. >> >> Dean >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Dean Pemberton <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Good Morning all, >> > >> > There will be a BoF on the subject of IP address leasing at the >> > APRICOT 2014 meeting on Tuesday, 25th Feb 2014 at 17:30 - 19:00 in the >> > Grand Caymans room on Level 10. >> > >> > I will be chairing this BoF and I'd like to invite all interested >> > parties to attend. >> > >> > While the concept of IP address leasing is not new, and has been the >> > primary model for ISP sub-delegation to its customers, there is an >> > assumption that some level of operational control is retained by the >> > ISP. There is an expectation that the registry data reflects an >> > operational hierarchy that makes it possible for people to look up >> > 'parent' blocks and use the contact information at that level to >> > resolve operational issues at a lower level network block. >> > >> > This model and assumptions may no longer be valid in the IPv4 >> > exhaustion state we're currently in. Addresses may be leased out with >> > no operational service or control attached to it. How should the >> > registry reflect this reality, to maintain its important role in >> > facilitating operational trouble shooting? Policy-wise, should lessors >> > be allowed to accumulate address space, using leasing demands as >> > 'demonstrated need' in getting more IP addresses transferred to them? >> > >> > Voice your opinion in a healthy debate in this BoF, held to gauge the >> > community's sentiment on these important issues. >> > >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Dean >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Dean >> >> _______________________________________________ >> apnic-transfers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-transfers >> > > -- Regards, Dean
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
