Skeeve,

First of all, there's probably going to be a lot of this:
In a previous life, I obtained on behalf of my then employer three adjacent 
"Class C" (and no, they weren't "/24"s in those days!) address blocks. And we 
later inherited at least two more non-adjacent blocks from mergers with other 
companies. I know that only about three or four individual IP addresses of all 
these allocations are visible on the Internet, and that the organisation 
quickly moved to RFC1918 private addresses internally, so the legacy blocks are 
all just about completely unused. Suddenly, their legacy space may be worth 
actual money. This company is not and never has been an APNIC member. I'm sure 
there are lots of other stories like mine.

Secondly, I believe that pragmatism ought to, in this matter, rule over 
principle:
So, we should not say that the vendor must become an APNIC member to reap the 
benefit of their 'found money', because by and large they won't bother, thus 
pushing the transfers underground.
I would say that the buyer / first intermediary must register the 'new' block 
of IP addresses with (in this case) APNIC, so that it moves out of 'legacy' 
space into 'regular' address space, then becomes subject to the existing 
regulatory framework. I may be banging a familiar drum here, but I don't think 
there should be any requirement to demonstrate 'need' for the purchaser to be 
allowed to register a legacy block: in my view the readiness to pony up some 
cash demonstrates sufficient 'need'.
The difficult practical / legal issue may be: how does the vendor demonstrate 
that a particular block of legacy space is in fact theirs to sell, particularly 
if it's never been visible on the Internet?


Regards


Mike

Note: The views expressed are my personal opinion and may not represent the 
position (if any) of my employer

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2014 11:08 a.m.
To: [email protected]; [email protected] SIG List
Subject: [sig-policy] Policy Regarding Transfers of Legacy Space

Hi All,

I've been contacted by a holder of some small (not relevant) legacy space who 
was inquiring about selling it.

But, they are not an APNIC member (or a Non-Member).

Referring to: 
http://www.apnic.net/publications/media-library/documents/membership/non-member-fees#Historical
 under 1.4, it talks about receiving transfers, but not making transfers.

Any thoughts?

...Skeeve

Skeeve Stevens - eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ; 
www.eintellegonetworks.com<http://www.eintellegonetworks.com/>

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellegonetworks<http://facebook.com/eintellegonetworks> ; 
linkedin.com/in/skeeve<http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>

twitter.com/theispguy<http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; blog: 
www.theispguy.com<http://www.theispguy.com/>

[http://eintellegonetworks.com/logos/ein09.png]
The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering

The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or 
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to