Hi Skeeve,

Thanks. Much appreciated!

Met vriendelijke groet,
Sander Steffann

> Op 6 jun. 2014 om 01:08 heeft Skeeve Stevens <[email protected]> het volgende 
> geschreven:
> 
> Complete understand Sander... but a community often finds value in discussing 
> the issue in their own context before taking opinions to the wider community.
> 
> Inside APNIC this happens often, especially in the Japanese community who 
> often discuss proposals before taking their views to the APNIC meetings.
> 
> My intent to bring the discussion up here was to see if the APNIC community 
> had any opinions before taking those to the RIPE list.
> 
> 
> ...Skeeve
> 
> Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker
> v4Now - an eintellego Networks service
> [email protected] ; www.v4now.com
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
> facebook.com/v4now ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
> 
> IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers
> 
> 
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Sander Steffann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Skeeve,
>> 
>> > I don't agree at all.  There may be many who might have an opinion on this 
>> > policy but do not follow RIR policy proposals.  I brought it here because 
>> > it has an effect on the APNIC region and people may provide a local 
>> > context and opinion which I or others may take back to the RIPE list.
>> >
>> > Any discussion is good, no matter where it takes place.
>> 
>> I didn't mean to imply that discussion isn't good. I agree with you that it 
>> is. However, anything that happens outside of the RIPE mailing lists will 
>> not be taken into account in the policy development process (it would be 
>> impossible for the RIPE address working group participants to keep track of 
>> where things are being discussed).
>> 
>> It is good (certainly for an inter-RIR policy) that people outside of the 
>> RIPE community take an interest. All 'official' stuff about RIPE policy has 
>> to be on RIPE mailing lists though.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Sander
>> 
> 
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to