-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 With the 'non-removal' of the needs assessment, I am happy to support this proposal.
thanks -gaurab On 3/5/15 4:50 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote: > The only addition to this text was the clarification of > demonstrated need. It is not being removed and will remain in > place as below. > > "Organizations requesting a delegation under these terms must > demonstrate that they are able to use 25% of the requested > addresses immediately and 50% within one year." > > ===== > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > prop-113-v003: Modification in the IPv4 eligibility criteria > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Proposer: Aftab Siddiqui > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > Skeeve Stevens > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > 1. Problem statement > > -------------------- > > > The current APNIC IPv4 delegation policy defines multiple > eligibility criteria and applicants must meet one criteria to be > eligible to receive IPv4 resources. One of the criteria dictates > that “an organization is eligible if it is currently multi-homed > with provider-based addresses, or demonstrates a plan to multi-home > within one month” (section 3.3). > > > The policy seems to imply that multi-homing is mandatory even if > there is no use case for the applicant to be multi-homed or even > when there is only one upstream provider available, this has > created much confusion in interpreting this policy. > > > As a result organizations have either tempted to provide incorrect > or fabricated multi-homing information to get the IPv4 resources or > barred themselves from applying. > > > > 2. Objective of policy change > > ----------------------------- > > > In order to make the policy guidelines simpler we are proposing to > modify the text of section 3.3. > > > > 3. Situation in other regions > > ----------------------------- > > > ARIN: > > There is no multi-homing requirement > > > RIPE: > > There is no multi-homing requirement. > > > LACNIC: > > Applicant can either have multi-homing requirement or > interconnect. > > > AFRINIC: > > There is no multi-homing requirement. > > > > 4. Proposed policy solution > > --------------------------- > > > > > Section 3.3: Criteria for small delegations > > > An organization is eligible if: > > > * > > it is currently multi-homed OR > > > * > > currently utilising provider (ISP) assignment of at least a /24, > AND intends to be multi-homed OR > > > * > > intends to be multi-homed > > > AND > > > * > > advertise the prefixes within 6 months > > > Organizations requesting a delegation under these terms must > demonstrate that they are able to use 25% of the requested > addresses immediately and 50% within one year. > > > 5. Advantages / Disadvantages > > ----------------------------- > > > Advantages: > > > Simplifies the process of applying for IPv4 address space for > small delegations and delays the immediate requirement for > multi-homing as determined to be appropriate within the timeframe > as detailed in Section 3.3. > > > > Disadvantages: > > > There is no known disadvantage of this proposal. > > > > 6. Impact on resource holders > > ----------------------------- > > > No impact on existing resource holders. > > > > 7. References > > ------------- > > > > > > ...Skeeve > > *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego > Networks service [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; > www.v4now.com <http://www.v4now.com/> > > Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > > facebook.com/v4now <http://facebook.com/v4now> ; > <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>linkedin.com/in/skeeve > <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve> > > twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; blog: > www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/> > > > IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * _______________________________________________ sig-policy > mailing list [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > - -- http://www.gaurab.org.np/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlT36RYACgkQSo7fU26F3X2XUACgi8eS4uSMM+2WnU+ZoWH6L+jA fGgAoOUDkwgzOLb2CYtHRsH2Unx3pBXv =HrSm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
