I think this is an improvement, but I can support either way. Owen
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 21:54 , Sanjeev Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Skeeve Stevens <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > 4. Proposed policy solution > --------------------------- > > An organisation is eligible for an ASN assignment if: > > - they are currently multi-homed OR > > - you have been previous allocated provider independent address space by > APNIC AND > > - intend to multi-home in the future > > May I suggest a change? > > > An organisation is eligible for an ASN assignment if: > > - they are currently multi-homed OR > > - you are currently allocated provider independent address space by > APNIC AND intend to multi-home in the future > > The first change is to remove those who are moving to NIRs, or other RIRs. > They should apply for resources from their current Registery. > > The second change is to clarify that the "AND" in #3 applies to #2, not #1 OR > #2. > > -- > Sanjeev Gupta > +65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane > <http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane> > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
