Thanks Adam,

Of course, I meant prop-114 and 115, not 104 and 105.

Masato@iPhone

> On Sep 15, 2015, at 10:01, Masato Yamanishi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Yes, I know.
> Do I need to fix it?
> 
> Masato@iPhone
> 
>> On Sep 15, 2015, at 09:46, Adam Gosling <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Masato,
>> 
>> I think you mean (one opposition for prop-114 and one support for prop-115) 
>> 
>> Not 104 and 105.
>> 
>> Adam
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 14/09/2015 18:28, "[email protected] on behalf of Masato 
>> Yamanishi" <[email protected] on behalf of 
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Colleagues,
>> 
>> While now I'm seeing a lot of comments on the list and it is good thing,
>> let me ask you to state these comments before asking consensus in OPM.
>> 
>> While I have announced three proposal discussed in Jakarta, only two comments
>> (one opposition for prop-104 and one support for prop-105) were made on the 
>> list.
>> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/archive/2015/08/
>> Even in the meeting, the discussion was not so active compared to previous 
>> meetings.
>> 
>> Without enough comments and discussions before asking consensus, authors 
>> cannot
>> improve their proposals in timely manner. Also, few discussion makes 
>> difficult for Chairs
>> to gauging community's opinion. As a result, proposals may need more 
>> meetings to
>> reach consensus or fail. Certainly, "no interest" is one of possible 
>> opinions,
>> but it is not easy to distinguish them from "not yet been interested" or 
>> "just hesitate".
>> 
>> IMO, current situation is not bottom-up discussion and rather it looks like 
>> a voting
>> for the agenda which were provided by somebody.
>> 
>> So, please express your opinion and have productive discussion before asking 
>> consensus
>> in Auckland and future meetings.
>> 
>> Thank you for your understanding.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Masato Yamanishi
>> APNIC Policy SIG Chair
>> 
>> 
>> 
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to