Hi Tomohiro-san, With all respect, discussions are for the mailing list. The policy-sig at APNIC isn't to think up policy, but to present a policy, discuss and tweak if necessary.
You really should present your ideas here, and let us all discuss. Yes, sometimes there is not much discussion, but you should at least try. I hope to see what your suggestions are. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service [email protected] ; www.v4now.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com ; Keybase: https://keybase.io/skeeve IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:34 PM, 藤崎智宏 <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > We've posted new version of prop-115, and it will appear on the web soon. > > Main modification points are: > - remove IPv4 text > - propose several methods to register and distribute IPv6 assignment > information (thank you for your suggestion in the previous sig meeting) > > Authors discussed about methods, but could not reach a decision which to > be used. At this time, in the next sig meeting, we would like to discuss > more > about the methods and find a conclusion. > > We appreciate if you give us any comments or suggestions. > > Yours Sincerely, > -- > Ruri Hiromi > Tomohiro Fujisaki > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
