Thanks for the reference. So there is no policy. During APNIC42 secretariat was seeking clarification for APNIC's Internet Number Resources Policy
APNIC-127-v002 *6.1.1. Additional allocation rounds* Address space returned to APNIC, or allocated to APNIC from the 'IANA Recovered IPv4 Pool' will be added to the non-103/8 IPv4 address pool. If address space in this pool becomes sufficient to delegate a further /22 to each APNIC account holder, additional delegation rounds will be announced. APNIC-127 is derived from various documents (apnic-089, apnic-094 apnic-109, apnic-116, apnic-123, apnic-124, apnic-125) and the above statement probably came from apnic-124 which states: "Following the additional delegation of IPv4 address space to APNIC from the 'IANA Recovered IPv4 Pool' as the result of the "Global policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA", from 27 May 2014, each APNIC account holder will become eligible to request and receive additional delegations up to a maximum of /22 address space from an APNIC non-103/8 IPv4 address pool." Everywhere "non-103/8" has been mentioned. If APNIC member returns 103/8 address space then it shouldn't be re-allocated through above procedure. On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 at 19:20 藤崎智宏 <fujis...@syce.net> wrote: > Hi Aftab, > > 2017-01-29 20:54 GMT+09:00 Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddi...@gmail.com>: > > > >> > >> 1. Problem statement > >> -------------------- > >> APNIC currently makes delegations from two IPv4 pools. These are the > >> 103/8 (Final /8) pool and the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool. > >> > >> With current policy, all returned address space, including 103/8 blocks, > >> will be merged into the IPv4 Recovered pool. > > > > > > Under which policy 103/8 returned addresses will be merged in recovered > > pool? Please share the reference. > > My understanding is that after prop-105 was implemented, returned IPv4 > address processing was changed, and current practice is merging all > returned addresses into the recovered pool. > > Please refer the transcript at APNIC 42, and chair's e-mail to the > policy sig ML. > > Email: > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/archive/2016/11/msg00001.html > > From the transcript of APNIC 42: > https://conference.apnic.net/42/program#/schedule/day/8/policy-sig-3 > > > I think the Secretariat is > > > > looking for more input from the community about > > > > where returned 103s should be because currently we > > > > are putting them in the recovered pool, which would > > > > be very complicated if this policy went ahead. > > Yours Sincerely, > --- > Tomohiro Fujisaki > > 2017-01-29 20:54 GMT+09:00 Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddi...@gmail.com>: > > > >> > >> 1. Problem statement > >> -------------------- > >> APNIC currently makes delegations from two IPv4 pools. These are the > >> 103/8 (Final /8) pool and the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool. > >> > >> With current policy, all returned address space, including 103/8 blocks, > >> will be merged into the IPv4 Recovered pool. > > > > > > Under which policy 103/8 returned addresses will be merged in recovered > > pool? Please share the reference. > > > > > > -- > > Best Wishes, > > > > Aftab A. Siddiqui > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > > * > > _______________________________________________ > > sig-policy mailing list > > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > -- Best Wishes, Aftab A. Siddiqui
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
