Hi Guangliang, Thank you for your question.
2017-02-21 15:17 GMT+09:00 Guangliang Pan <[email protected]>: > From implementation point of view, I have a question about your proposal. > > If each new account holder will be given priority in the waiting list, do you > mean new account holders will have their whole /21 on the waiting list ahead > of those existing account holders who are waiting for their second /22? Yes, current policy text intends that. I considered to add some steps such that first application will be up to /22 and so on, but it will make this policy complex. Yours Sincerely, --- Tomohiro Fujisaki 2017-02-21 15:17 GMT+09:00 Guangliang Pan <[email protected]>: > Dear Tomohiro, > > From implementation point of view, I have a question about your proposal. > > If each new account holder will be given priority in the waiting list, do you > mean new account holders will have their whole /21 on the waiting list ahead > of those existing account holders who are waiting for their second /22? > > Kind regards, > > Guangliang Pan (Benny) > Registration Services Manager, APNIC > Email: [email protected] > SIP: [email protected] > Phone: +61 7 3858 3188 > http://www.apnic.net > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * You can now call APNIC Helpdesk for free using Skype. For more information > visit: www.apnic.net/helpdesk > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ???? > Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2017 9:48 PM > To: Sumon Ahmed Sabir > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Revised version of Prop-117 (Prop-117-v002) > > Dear policy sig colleagues, > > I got some comments to prop-117-v001, and modified that as follows. > > - changed maximum distribution size after exhaustion equal to current size > - clean up the text > > I would appreciate it if you could give any comments. > > Yours Sincerely, > --- > Tomohiro Fujisaki > > > 2017-02-15 19:41 GMT+09:00 Sumon Ahmed Sabir <[email protected]>: >> >> Dear SIG Members, >> >> Tomohiro Fujisaki has submitted a revised version of Prop-117 ( >> Prop-117-v002) after getting some feedback from the community. >> >> Please review and share your thoughts if you have any comments, >> suggestions on the proposal. This proposal along with three other >> proposals will be discussed in APNIC43 Policy SIG meeting. >> >> Please also find all other proposals for APNIC43 Policy SIG here: >> >> https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/ >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Masato, Sumon >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> prop-117-v002: Returned IPv4 address management and Final /8 >> exhaustion >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Proposer: Tomohiro Fujisaki >> [email protected] >> >> >> 1. Problem statement >> -------------------- >> >> APNIC currently makes delegations from two IPv4 pools. These are the >> 103/8 (Final /8) pool and the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool. >> >> With current policy, all returned address space, including 103/8 >> blocks, will be merged into the IPv4 Recovered pool. >> >> If a 103/8 block is returned, it is placed in the IPv4 Recovered pool >> and re-distributed as returned space. Some organisations may receive >> duplicate blocks from 103/8: one under the final /8 policy, the other >> under the returned pool policy. >> >> Current APNIC Policy requires account holders to receive address space >> from the 103/8 (Final /8) pool before they can apply for address space >> from the Recovered pool. >> >> APNIC currently manages a Recovered Pool Waiting List for approved >> requests that cannot be met from the IPv4 Recovered pool. >> >> >> 2. Objective of policy change >> ----------------------------- >> >> To simplify the address pool management and to provide guidance for >> 103/8 pool exhaustion. >> >> >> 3. Situation in other regions >> ----------------------------- >> >> None. >> >> >> 4. Proposed policy solution >> --------------------------- >> >> Handling reurned address: >> - Recovered 103/8 space will be placed in the 103/8 (Final /8) pool. >> - Recovered non-103/8 space will be placed in the IPv4 Recovered pool. >> >> Guidance for 103/8 pool exhaustion: >> - The first time an approved request cannot be fulfilled from the 103/8 >> pool, Final /8 delegations will end. >> - APNIC will begin to manage only one (Recovered) IPv4 pool containing >> any residual 103/8 space and all future returns, including 103/8 >> returns. >> - Each new account holder can receive up to a /21 from the IPv4 >> Recovered pool. >> - Existing account holders who have not yet received the maximum /21 >> from the two pools may continue to apply for space from the Recovered >> pool until they have received a maximum /21 from the two pools. >> - A waiting list will be created if approved requests cannot be >> fulfilled. Each new account holder will be given priority in the >> waiting list. >> >> >> 5. Advantages / Disadvantages >> ----------------------------- >> >> Advantages: >> >> - Simplifying management of remaining IPv4 address pools. >> >> Disadvantages: >> >> None. >> >> >> 6. Impact on resource holders >> ------------------------------ >> >> No impact to resource holders. >> >> >> 7. References >> ------------- >> >> prop-117-v2.txt >> Displaying prop-117-v2.txt. >> >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
