Hi Adam , Thanks for your comments .
*Handling returned address: - Recovered 103/8 space will be placed in the 103/8 (Final /8) pool.* * - Recovered non-103/8 space will be placed in the IPv4 Recovered pool.* Agreed . *Regards / Jahangir * On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Adam Gosling <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Jahangir > > > > Final /8 blocks that are returned from Member accounts are being held in a > ‘reserved’ status by the Secretariat until the community decides to put > them back in the Final /8 free pool, or place them in the IPv4 recovered > pool where non-103/8 returns are placed. > > > > At APNIC 43 the proposal reaching consensus was to return them to the > Final /8 pool. > > > > This final call will end today, unless extended by the Chairs. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Adam > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Adam Gosling > > Senior Internet Policy Analyst, APNIC > > e: [email protected] > > p: +61 7 3858 3142 <+61%207%203858%203142> > > m: +61 421 456 243 <+61%20421%20456%20243> > > www.apnic.net > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > Join the conversation: https://blog.apnic.net/ > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > *From: *<[email protected]> on behalf of Jahangir > Hossain <[email protected]> > *Date: *Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 19:39 > *To: *Sumon Ahmed Sabir <[email protected]> > *Cc: *Policy Mailing List <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [sig-policy] Final Comment Period for prop-117-v003: > Returned IPv4 address management and Final /8 exhaustion > > > > Hi everyone , > > I have a simple question for clarification . How 103/8 block is returned to > APNIC which already assigned to members ? > > > > > > *Regards / Jahangir * > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Sumon Ahmed Sabir <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > Part of prop-117: "Returned IPv4 address management and Final /8 > exhaustion", > reached consensus at the APNIC 43 Policy SIG and then later at the AGM. > > Components of the proposal regarding which pool 103/8 blocks should be > returned to reached consensus. There was no agreement on the proposal for > Final /8 pool exhaustion procedures. > > A new version prop-117-v003 was created to make it clear which part of > the proposal is reaching the final Comment Period. > > Synopsis: > --------- > > The proposed policy solution reaching consensus is > > Handling returned address: > - Recovered 103/8 space will be placed in the 103/8 (Final /8) pool. > - Recovered non-103/8 space will be placed in the IPv4 Recovered pool. > > This proposal will now move to the next step in the APNIC Policy > Development Process and is being returned to the Policy SIG mailing list > for the final Comment Period. > > At the end of this period the Policy SIG Chairs will evaluate comments > made and determine if the consensus reached at APNIC 43 still holds. The > Chairs may extend the Comment Period to a maximum of eight (8) weeks to > allow further discussion. > > If consensus holds, the Chair of the Policy SIG will ask the APNIC > Executive > Council to endorse the proposal for implementation. > > - Send all comments and questions to: <sig-policy at apnic dot net> > - Deadline for comments: 23:59 (UTC +10) Wednesday, 12 April 2017 > > Proposal details, including the full text of the proposal, history, and > links to previous versions are available at: > > https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-117/ > > Regards > > Sumon, Ching-Heng, Bertrand > Policy SIG Chairs > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > prop-117-v003: Returned IPv4 address management and Final /8 exhaustion > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Proposer: Tomohiro Fujisaki > [email protected] > > > 1. Problem statement > -------------------- > > APNIC currently makes delegations from two IPv4 pools. These are the > 103/8 (Final /8) pool and the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool. > > With current policy, all returned address space, including 103/8 blocks, > will be merged into the IPv4 Recovered pool. > > If a 103/8 block is returned, it is placed in the IPv4 Recovered pool > and re-distributed as returned space. Some organisations may receive > duplicate blocks from 103/8: one under the final /8 policy, the other > under the returned pool policy. > > Current APNIC Policy requires account holders to receive address space > from the 103/8 (Final /8) pool before they can apply for address space > from the Recovered pool. > > APNIC currently manages a Recovered Pool Waiting List for approved > requests that cannot be met from the IPv4 Recovered pool. > > > 2. Objective of policy change > ----------------------------- > > To simplify the address pool management and to provide guidance for > 103/8 pool exhaustion. > > > 3. Situation in other regions > ----------------------------- > > None. > > > 4. Proposed policy solution > --------------------------- > > Handling returned address: > - Recovered 103/8 space will be placed in the 103/8 (Final /8) pool. > - Recovered non-103/8 space will be placed in the IPv4 Recovered pool. > > > 5. Advantages / Disadvantages > ----------------------------- > > Advantages: > > - Simplifying management of remaining IPv4 address pools. > > Disadvantages: > > None. > > > 6. Impact on resource holders > ------------------------------ > > No impact to resource holders. > > > 7. References > ------------- > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > > > -- > > > --
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
