Hello, I oppose this proposal as written.
I do not believe this policy proposal benefits network operations. I believe it is intended to further the goals of the policy proposer and the company he owns/works at, which exists to earn money from the sale and leasing of IP address blocks (per their website). If the policy proposal has shed light on some deficiencies in the Membership Agreement (found at: https://www.apnic.net/about-apnic/corporate-documents/documents/membership/membership-agreement/ <https://www.apnic.net/about-apnic/corporate-documents/documents/membership/membership-agreement/> ), then I suggest it would be helpful for the policy proposer to work with APNIC staff and/or the EC, rather than through the Policy SIG. Thank you, David David Huberman | Principal Program Manager Oracle Cloud 1501 4th Ave #1800 Seattle, WA 98101 USA
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
