Dear,
How I can reject this policy? Best Regards, Ernest Tse On Mon, 11/09/2017 10.48, chku <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear SIG members > > A new version of the proposal "prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 > addresses in the final /8 block" has been sent to the Policy SIG for > review. > > It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 44 which will > be held in Taichung, Taiwan on Wednesday and Thursday, 14 & 15 September > 2017. > > Information about earlier versions is available from: > > > https://u5763498.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=xF2otKml8FKK0iLyO1O8huUrPPtUbHhO65cb-2BIfOx1yQjk8JFqaVBIhGSNZmoA60HzfaHCDu9Iw4b6uebr7emg-3D-3D_UAkvnIPiyHBK93gJxXZbN-2FFqWUVGpvc0TKjBg0wTWpU7rJAEIASPc6SjCR1ohrttjF6AUrduN4-2B8vUrqwHK4Z56pAC0Buk753e7zo7mW7PhTr-2FJQwXz5cOLDD1ALGjH05Iq3IToV5F-2BDTgKycvcN9ko1eR6cl7xD4EQcDZBqFcQbAayMSGs3UMdAQWJ1JI2LR-2BvB-2F-2FKFyOORIoapzDDu2unKVCXqTJU-2FNsN6KqYFIiQ-3D > > The changes are: > > - updated stat data in section 1 > > - added ripe region status in section 3 > > - added end date in section 4 > > 4. Proposed policy solution > --------------------------- > > Prohibit transfer IPv4 addresses under final /8 address block (103/8) > which have not passed two years after its allocation/assignment. If > the address block allocated to a LIR in two years is not needed any > more, it must return to APNIC to allocate to another organization > using final /8 policy. This two years requirement will apply both > market and M&A transfers. > > ->(added) This restriction will end when final /8 address block > (103/8) run out. > > > Please find the text of the proposal below. > > Kind Regards, > > Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng > APNIC Policy SIG Chairs > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > prop-116-v005: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Proposer: Tomohiro Fujisaki > [email protected] > > > 1. Problem statement > -------------------- > > There are a lot of transfers of IPv4 address blocks from 103/8 > happening, both within the APNIC region and among RIRs. > > Then number of transfers from 103/8 block are 352, which is about > 14% of the total number of transfers as of 10 Septermber 2017. > This is the highest number of transfers in all APNIC managed /8s. > > And based on the information provided by APNIC Secretariat, number of > transfers from the 103/8 block are increasing year by year. > > Updated by APNIC Secretariat on 27 January 2017: > > 1) M&A transfers containing 103/8 space > > +------+-----------+-----------+- > | | Total | Number of | > | Year | Transfers | /24s | > +------+-----------+-----------+- > | 2011 | 3 | 12 | > | 2012 | 10 | 46 | > | 2013 | 18 | 66 | > | 2014 | 126 | 498 | > | 2015 | 147 | 573 | > | 2016 | 63 | 239 | > | 2017 | 45 | 178 | > +------+-----------+------------+- > > 2) Market transfers containing 103/8 space > > +------+-----------+-----------+ > | | Total | Number of | > | Year | Transfers | /24s | > +------+-----------+-----------+ > | 2011 | 2 | 2 | > | 2012 | 21 | 68 | > | 2013 | 16 | 61 | > | 2014 | 25 | 95 | > | 2015 | 67 | 266 | > | 2016 | 103 | 394 | > | 2017 | 70 | 288 | > +------+-----------+-----------+ > > And also, transfers from the 103/8 block include: > - Take place within 1 year of distribution, or > - Multiple blocks to a single organization in case of beyond 1 year. > > Further, there is a case where a single organization have received 12 > blocks transfers from 103 range. > > see: > https://u5763498.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=16bEysF9x2jUX1XY2ZMKUg8gVLuW61BSR2eB8RsQYdH8zD7GXy6jhlTyK5G3dMIUGHT9gdk4VkDuKrAW1lF6NA-3D-3D_UAkvnIPiyHBK93gJxXZbN-2FFqWUVGpvc0TKjBg0wTWpU7rJAEIASPc6SjCR1ohrtt9q1mC2UW-2By1nUz5fNNIvcxzDKBxSLVZcQzxfw05QE1tXM4yEv3KUlohMocXI5sFLcdYgAzNBLWX1BWKhlrnC00jV61YxnvsF-2F3ebmpOWpzUSGypjIsONBNcwe8B8QPl35JJZpMw3T8dFCF8P9WS17s-2FuRwPezaxytk4f6iuWTGk-3D > > From these figures, it is quite likely that substantial number of 103/8 > blocks are being used for transfer purpose. > > This conflicts with the concept of distribution of 103/8 block > (prop-062), which is intended to accommodate minimum IPv4 address blocks > for new comers. > > prop-062: Use of final /8 > > https://u5763498.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=16bEysF9x2jUX1XY2ZMKUpZ2MNT0Jh9riZ8Aw0jq3-2BBKFT98-2BB8q5RClctPGmvsE4BXqvGUawDCW-2Bgfn5Jn7-2Bw-3D-3D_UAkvnIPiyHBK93gJxXZbN-2FFqWUVGpvc0TKjBg0wTWpU7rJAEIASPc6SjCR1ohrttnBRRWSHQq7r-2BAw3HWx-2FWqvIwxjBcdKu3cJJpQ5kuLOMFUrJ-2F0y-2FtpTYIlVsdkZDmx2a-2F3TKp3GG2wrqX86CJ9YLzljuP3t7kpfWs8T8KsDx4-2BZC3kQxnaQsC77gB-2BbhnLTtSxK-2BzSwUp3GGlldpOV9j7Z0ypyJGi2ud2fgG-2BHkQ-3D > > > 2. Objective of policy change > ----------------------------- > > When stated problem is solved, distribution from 103/8 block will be > consistent with its original purpose, for distribution for new entrants > to the industry. Without the policy change, substantial portion of 103/8 > blocks will be consumed for transfer purpose. > > > 3. Situation in other regions > ----------------------------- > "RIPE Resource Transfer Policies" says: > > 2.2 Transfer Restrictions > > Scarce resources, which are understood as those resources that are > allocated or assigned by the RIPE NCC on a restricted basis (such as > IPv4 or 16-bit ASNs), cannot be transferred for 24 months from the > date the resource was received by the resource holder. This > restriction also applies if the resource was received due to a change > in the organisation°«s business (such as a merger or acquisition). > > > 4. Proposed policy solution > --------------------------- > > Prohibit transfer IPv4 addresses under final /8 address block (103/8) > which have not passed two years after its allocation/assignment. If > the address block allocated to a LIR in two years is not needed any > more, it must return to APNIC to allocate to another organization > using final /8 policy. This two years requirement will apply both > market and M&A transfers. > > This restriction will end when final /8 address block (103/8) run out. > > 5. Advantages / Disadvantages > ----------------------------- > > Advantages: > - It makes 103/8 blocks available according to the original purpose, > as distribution for new entrants (rather than being consumed for > transfer purpose) > > - IPv4 addresses under final /8 are not transferred to outside APNIC. > > - By prohibiting transfer, them, it is possible to keep one /22 for > each LIRs state, which is fair for all LIRs. > > Disadvantages: > > None. > > > 6. Impact on resource holders > ------------------------------ > > - LIRs cannot transfer address blocks under 103/8. No big impact while > they use it. > > - Organizations which needs to receive transferred IPv4 can continue > to do so, outside 103/8 blocks (which should be made available for > new entrants) > > > 7. References > ------------- > RIPE Resource Transfer Policies > https://u5763498.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=xF2otKml8FKK0iLyO1O8hovsqCyGPCffWxWRVmzZKc-2F22UMCMsKH3f0jgbfy5GNOxYaZjrjiaqFN8wxTSqxs7Q-3D-3D_UAkvnIPiyHBK93gJxXZbN-2FFqWUVGpvc0TKjBg0wTWpU7rJAEIASPc6SjCR1ohrtt3Bxsv4sPokRDCYiFUC7JP7gw2j0YFZWonR6jmdqbFEyGxF0e7WpAJubY4HUOIqGYALsYh6jCjoHBIrweKZW5QVvX0hjwaptjhuh7BRhKrKh-2BBNzmnXdRBtcn0cjhuK28-2B7cV3THEtR3YGopQsKgToq4m6lxHWlZetqJo9UJx8Pw-3D > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://u5763498.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=16bEysF9x2jUX1XY2ZMKUmipBN84-2BmQ2TjZWRnzKphdJ0-2BKxcniH6DgValcOC2GuxhPMQtuW0tiU5TPMpCEiaQ-3D-3D_UAkvnIPiyHBK93gJxXZbN-2FFqWUVGpvc0TKjBg0wTWpU7rJAEIASPc6SjCR1ohrttVe7XgK38Qebw2ZUMC3f6tlTKmXKsMlUujydPgoWaIZpWWKc9y5Idu2KQI78FW9ZNw9-2BAwzvm2CEV76r-2BPrCPcJDmKlK7fIysrY8zXOWq-2FRBA2dVVp5Kd4rmBMWttbOHvNQ7zZEwlv1MrY29o3yoSM2ZWvF7-2BMPB5gmEEorDwTHg-3D
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
