Hi all, I think the clearest message form the SIG meeting today is that we must keep the 4 weeks period for the submission before the meeting.
I will like to know if you will agree with something mid-term in between 1 week and 4 weeks. Does the community think that 2 or 3 weeks may be sufficient? My other question. I guess there will be some minutes or I can look at the video from the meeting, but it will be much better, I think, if all the people that contributed with their opinion, can state clearly here in the list their comments on each step (1, 2, 3) and even the appeals process. This will take you only 5 minutes, and if I get sufficient comments during the day, I can submit a new version already tonight, so we can keep the ball rolling. Thanks again to all those that have contributed! Regards, Jordi ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
