Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.
I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-133, based on a meeting we organised on 4th Feb to discuss these proposals. Many opposing opinions were expressed about this proposal. (comment details) - In the discuss about previous proposal, prop-124, some opinions were expressed as to who was in trouble and who needed to change, but it seems that the proposer did not respond to these opinions in this proposal. - IP addresses should be delegated on an as-needed basis, and if this proposal is passed, there is concern that clarification of the intended use at the time of acquisition will be lost. - While it may be good to loosen the policy operationally, we oppose easing the policy itself. - This proposal seems not to aim "Clarification" of Sub assignment. Regards, Satoru Tsurumaki / JPOPF Steering Team 2020年2月16日(日) 18:31 Bertrand Cherrier <[email protected]>: > > Dear SIG members > > A new version of the proposal "prop-133-v002: Clarification on > Sub-Assignments" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review. > > Information about earlier versions is available from: > > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-133 > > You are encouraged to express your views on the proposal: > > Do you support or oppose the proposal? > Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? > What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective? > > Please find the text of the proposal below. > > Kind Regards, > > Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng > APNIC Policy SIG Chairs > > ________________________________ > > prop-133-v002: Clarification on Sub-Assignments > > ________________________________ > > Proposer: Jordi Palet Martinez > [email protected] > > 1. Problem statement > > Note that this proposal is ONLY relevant when end-users obtain direct > assignments from APNIC, > or when a LIR obtains, also from APNIC, and assignment for exclusive use > within its infrastructure. > Consequently, this is NOT relevant in case of LIR allocations. > > The intended goal of assignments is for usage by end-users or LIRs in > their own infrastructure (servers, > equipment, interconnections, employees, guest devices, subcontractors, > only within that infrastructure), > not for sub-assignment in other networks. > > The current text uses a “must” together with “documented purposes”. As a > consequence, if there is a request > with a documented purpose, and in the future the assigned space is used > for some other purposes, it will > violate the policy. > > For example, a university may document in the request, that the assigned > addressing space will be used for > their own network devices and serves, but afterwards they also > sub-assign to the students in the campus > (still same infrastructure). This last purpose was not documented, so it > will fall out of the policy. > > 2. Objective of policy change > > Clarification of the text, by rewording it. > > 3. Situation in other regions > > This situation, has already been corrected in AFRINIC, ARIN, LACNIC and > RIPE. > > 4. Proposed policy solution > > Actual text: > 2.2.3. Assigned address space > Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or > end-user, for specific use within the Internet infrastructure they > operate. Assignments must only be made for specific, documented purposes > and may not be sub-assigned. > > Proposed text: > 2.2.3. Assigned address space > Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or > end-user, for exclusive use within the infrastructure they operate. > > 5. Advantages / Disadvantages > > Advantages: > Advantages of the proposal: > Fulfilling the objective above indicated and making sure to match the > real situation in the market. > > Disadvantages: > Disadvantages of the proposal: > None foreseen. > > 6. Impact on resource holders > > Impact on resource holders: > None. > > 7. References > > AFRINIC: https://www.afrinic.net/policy/2018-v6-002-d3#details > > ARIN: > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/nrpm/#2-5-allocation-assignment-reallocation-reassignment > and https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_15/ > > LACNIC: > https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2018-7?language=en > > RIPE NCC: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04 > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy -- -- Satoru Tsurumaki BBIX, Inc * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
