Dear Satoru-San and all,

Thank you very much for sharing your feedbacks  and raising your concerns.

I do agree that the concern is valid and it may repeat similar discussions
and we will be discussing similar issues.

>From SIG Chair Point of view, we have abandoned the earlier proposals as it
didn't reached consensus in three consecutive meetings and there were
merely any support for the proposal.

You are correct that if a proposal is abandoned then there will be no
further discussions about the proposals.

But if proposer feels that it is important for community and needed to be
discussed again and comes with a new proposal, as Policy Chair, it is our
duty to accommodate that as long as it falls under PDP guidelines.

And lastly it does not happen very often. So let us see how APNIC Community
think about the proposal in next three days.

best regards,

Sumon Ahmed Sabir
Chair, Policy SIG







On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 3:13 PM Tsurumaki, Satoru <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear SIG Chair and all,
>
> I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.
>
> I would like to share key feedback in our community for criteria for
> adopting the proposal based on a meeting we organised on 4th Feb.
>
> First of all, it should be pointed out that there is no intention to
> limit the proposals where the problem statement or proposal has
> changed.
>
> Japanese community concerned that it might repeated similar
> discussions if the resubmission of a proposal that was previously
> abandoned.
>
> My understanding is that "abandon" is a proposal that chair has
> decided that no further discussions will be made in the community, is
> this correct?
> If it is, I believe chair should indicate to the community why it was
> allowed to resubmit.
> And It might also need to define the criteria of resubmission.
>
> Regards,
> Satoru Tsurumaki / JPOPF Steering Team
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>    *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to