Hi Jordi,

Thanks for your suggestion. Secretariat will consult with the APNIC EC.

Regards
Sunny

On 24/02/2020 8:53 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Hi Bertrand, all,
> 
> As indicated in the meeting, the withdraw of this proposal is "temporary", in 
> view of the commitment from the EC/secretariat to review the discrepancies in 
> the actual PDP and SIG guidelines, assuming that this will be brought back to 
> the community, following the bottom-up-approach, but the next meeting 
> (maximum).
> 
> I still thing that this should not be a task done only by the EC/secretariat 
> but instead a Taks Force should be setup. I hope the EC can still consider 
> setting up this TF.
> 
> As a result of the EC review or TF review the community should be able to 
> decide how to move on, including, if needed, new policy proposals.
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> @jordipalet
>   
>   
> 
> El 24/2/20 3:57, "Bertrand Cherrier" <sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net en 
> nombre de b.cherr...@micrologic.nc> escribió:
> 
>      Dear colleagues
>      
>      Version 2 of prop-134: PDP Update, did not reach consensus and was
>      withdrawn by the author at the APNIC 49 Open Policy Meeting.
>      
>      Proposal details, including the full text of the proposal, history, and
>      links to previous versions are available at:
>      
>      https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-134/
>      
>      We'd like to thank the author and everyone for taking the time to
>      discuss this proposal.
>      
>      Regards
>      Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng
>      Policy SIG Chairs
>      *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy      
>      *
>      _______________________________________________
>      sig-policy mailing list
>      sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
>      https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>      
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
> individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
> considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
> prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
> original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> 
> 
> 
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           
> *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> 
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to