Absolutely. I think the intent here is all other cases which ideally have no reason for not being unannounced.
Regards Anupam. On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, 22:15 Owen DeLong, <[email protected]> wrote: > I will point out that unannounced != unused. There are plenty of > legitimate cases for needing globally unique addresses that are not > necessarily announced in the global routing table. Exchange points are one > example. Private networks that interact with multiple internet-connected > networks is another. > > Owen > > > On Aug 2, 2022, at 03:47, Anupam Agrawal <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > All- > > Section 4.2.1 of APNIC Internet Number Resource Policies (APNIC -127) > states that a significant amount of historical resources registered in the > APNIC Whois database are not announced to the global routing table. What's > the number we are talking about? > > Further, it has been mandated in the same section that APNIC needs to > contact networks responsible for resources not globally used for a > reasonable period of time. What's the period being considered currently? > Will it make sense to have a time period included for proactive action? > > Regards > ________________________________________________________ > Anupam Agrawal | India Internet Foundation - Chair | 91 990 399 2838 > > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > >
_______________________________________________ sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
