Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team..
I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-145, based on a meeting we organised on 29th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many support opinions were expressed about this proposal. And in response to a comment that HRM activities in Japan might be helpful, JPNIC staff reported on their activities in Japan. - Start Dec.2014 - Contact resource holders by any means possible, email, phone, mail, referral from an acquaintance, etc. - Finish 19th Mar 2019 with the signing of the contract with all resource Holders. (comment details) - There are many unresponses to contacts from APNIC, which may have a significant impact when it comes to consensus. - It would be better to explain HRM's past activities for new members for more understanding. - I support this proposal, but it will be necessary to response carefully to the resource holders Regards, Satoru Tsurumaki / JPOPF Steering Team 2022年8月11日(木) 16:00 chku <[email protected]>: > > Dear SIG members, > > The proposal "prop-147: Historical Resources Management" has been > sent to the Policy SIG for review. > > It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting (OPM) at APNIC 54 on > Thursday, 15 September 2022. > > https://conference.apnic.net/54/program/schedule/#/day/8 > > We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list > before the OPM. > > The comment period on the mailing list before the OPM is an important > part of the Policy Development Process (PDP). We encourage you to > express your views on the proposal: > > - Do you support or oppose this proposal? > - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so, > tell the community about your situation. > - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal? > - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? > - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective? > > Information about this proposal is appended below as well as available at: > > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-147 > > Regards, > Bertrand, Shaila, and Ching-Heng > APNIC Policy SIG Chairs > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > prop-147-v001: Historical Resources Management > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Proposer: Jordi Palet Martinez ([email protected]) > Anupam Agrawal ([email protected]) > > > 1. Problem statement > -------------------- > Section 4.2.1 is outdated and only looking for very old non-routed resources. > > The recent EC resolution (22nd February 2022), imply that historical resource > holders in the APNIC region would need to become Members or Non-Members by > 1st January 2023 in order to receive registration services. Failing this, > historical resource registration will no longer be published in the APNIC > Whois Database and said resources will be placed into reserved status. > > Given the continued need for IPv4 addresses, it would seem illogical to keep > these unused historical resources in reserve indefinitely. Alternatively, > these resources can be used in a way that is sufficiently justified in > accordance with existing policies, allowing other organizations to benefit > from them during the IPv6 transition. > > > 2. Objective of policy change > ----------------------------- > Ensure that historical IPv4 resources are justified and claimed, or that they > are available for other organizations that require them. > > If the resources are marked as reserved, the original holders may reclaim > them with a valid justification, when APNIC failed to contact them for > whatever reason. > > One example of a valid justification is the case where an organization is > actually using them internally and there are valid reasons to instead use > RFC1918 space, however the space is not routed. > > To give the original resource holders more time to reclaim them, we propose > two time-frames for the community discussion and consideration: 6 months and > 12 months. > > > 3. Situation in other regions > ----------------------------- > In other RIRs legacy resources lose their legacy status when the RSA is > signed (upon receiving other resources), so they become under the regular > monitoring. In other cases, there is nothing specified by policies. > > > 4. Proposed policy solution > --------------------------- > Proposed policy solution (option 6-months): > > Actual text: > 4.2.1. Recovery of unused historical resources (remove) > To recover these globally un-routed resources and place them back in the free > pool for re-delegation, APNIC will contact networks responsible for > historical address space in the APNIC region that has not been globally > routed since 1 January 1998. > > To recover un-routed historical AS numbers, APNIC will contact networks > responsible for resources not globally used for a reasonable period of time. > > Proposed text: > 4.3. Historical Resources Management > Historical resources that have not been claimed by the original resource > holder will be deleted from the APNIC Whois database after 1st January 2023, > and marked as reserved. > > Historical resources marked as reserved have an additional six (6) months to > be claimed by their original custodians. After that, APNIC will add these > resources to the available pool for re-delegation. > > Proposed policy solution (option 12-months): > Actual text: > 4.2.1. Recovery of unused historical resources (remove) > To recover these globally un-routed resources and place them back in the free > pool for re-delegation, APNIC will contact networks responsible for > historical address space in the APNIC region that has not been globally > routed since 1 January 1998. > > To recover un-routed historical AS numbers, APNIC will contact networks > responsible for resources not globally used for a reasonable period of time. > > Proposed text: > 4.3. Historical Resources Management > Historical resources that have not been claimed by the original resource > holder will be deleted from the APNIC Whois database after 1st January 2023, > and marked as reserved. > > Historical resources marked as reserved have an additional twelve (12) months > to be claimed by their original custodians. After that, APNIC will add these > resources to the available pool for re-delegation. > > > 5. Advantages / Disadvantages > ----------------------------- > Advantages: > Fulfilling the objective above indicated. > > Disadvantages: > None. > > > 6. Impact on resource holders > ----------------------------- > None. > > > 7. References > ------------- > None. > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- -- Satoru Tsurumaki BBIX, Inc _______________________________________________ sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
