I remember back in '99 when Brandon W. Beasley wrote:
> I got me a new 6 gigger.  I have read about as much as I should on various
> partitioning schemes.  But, why should I not simply create one partition?
> 
> If partitioning is truly wise, then what is the current wisdom for breaking
> down a larger hard drive into linux partitions?

This is indeed an interesting question, and one that I'd like to
get feedback about as well.  Even if you don't have a really great
rationale, I'd like to see what people do..

You probably could do worse than this:

  /     .5 GB
Pesky old bioses required this to get LILO to work, but I still think
it is nice to have a non-huge root partition.

 /home  .5 - 1 GB
This depends on how much you like to use your home dir for storage,
and how many users you anticipate.  I like to keep /home and /
distinct to keep from filling up / with user files.  Note, if you're
really cautious about this you would want a distinct /tmp and
/var/spool as well[1], with a smaller root partition.

 /usr   1 - 2 GB
If you're a big fan of installing software this is going to need space.

 /scratch whatever is left over.
This is the catch all.  I use this drive for downloads, compiles,
mp3's, anything that takes up big hunks of space, that I don't
need to keep in my home directory, and that could probably
disappear without critical loss of usability.

Don't forget you can use symlinks to make your life easier.  
I have a fairly baroque setup on my 486 at home, since it
has 3 drives and at one time has two linuxen, DOS, and Win95
on it.

/dev/sda1               495666    418267     51800  89% /
/dev/hda2               350306    310958     21258  94% /system
/dev/sdb1               495666    418443     51624  89% /usr
/dev/hda1               153520    112696     40824  73% /dos
/dev/hda3               525387    433009     92378  82% /scratch

/system hold various spool directories, my boot files, and some
/usr/src stuff.
/scratch has a newsfeed and some other junk like a dl directory.

You can go too far with the symlinks, but at least it's flexible.

                Matt

[1] Follow this, and you get A Traditional UNIX file layout, with
about a half dozen partitions and lots of wasted space, but less
vulnerability to other problems.






-- 
/* Matt Sayler -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- atwork?astronomy:cs
   http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mpsayler   -- (512)471-7450
   Have you ever imagined a world with no hypothetical situations? */
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to