I guess Bill is disillusioned enough to think that M$'s single point of
failure is that it didn't heed the old warning about those who don't know
Unix being doomed to recreate it poorly. But I don't see how any level of
disillusionment could possibly let a person think that W2K (it's proper
name) could make reparations for this...Then again, I'm probably just
being a disillusioned linux zealot.
jw
(PS: VNC is really cool! Go AT&T!)
--
J. W. Scott GeoCel International
Developer / BFD (Big Fscking Dork)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (512) 485-7550
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Brandon W. Beasley wrote:
> Gates uttered the following Newspeak at the Dell ego support group
> yesterday:
>
> "[Windows 2000] should eliminate the UNIX single point of failure
> issue."
>
> What the hell does that mean? "UNIX single point of failure"?
>
> Is that the lack of a unified UNIX platform? Or what?
>
> Yours truly,
>
> The Uninitiated.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
