> I've been running a celeron 366->567 for a few months now and a
> K6-233->263 and haven't noticed anything wrong (but that is a good way
> to test it). Has anyone else noticed any longterm stability issues with
> Linux & overclocking? I don't mean obvious crashes, I mean the
> possibility of tiny bits of data becoming corrupted over weeks (if
> Chris' assumption is correct).
I've had my kernel sources corrupted when I was doing the stress-test I
talked about.. it isn't so much periodic as it is random. really, the
best way to make sure that the processor itself isn't having any problems
is just to compile lots of stuff and make sure there are no sig11's.. You
will often get sig11's on systems that otherwise seem to work fine. I've
also noticed erratic network operations and all kinds of funky problems.
My celerons were, unfortunately, not cut out for oc'ing, and so they've
stayed at 366, and given me a horribly fast system nonetheless ;p
-Justin
|--------------------------------------------------
| Justin Ryan
| Developer Relations Associate
| TurboLinux - http://www.turbolinux.com/
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| WebMaster, PCHelp - http://computers.iwz.com
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|--------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
