On 04/17/2012 01:56 PM, Joel Holdsworth wrote: > Third, biot: what state is your analog work in? Are you working in a > branch? Is it going into the mainline any time soon? If so I can begin to > integrate the Fx2 analog stuff with that.
- DSO-2090 driver mostly working -- it outputs valid streaming scope data to the libsigrok bus. It'll need some more protocol work after that. Also we'll need a TON of new DI's defined for all the options and settings a scope has that an LA simply doesn't: time base, voltage gain etc. - libsigrok analog support needs quite a bit done still. I have the payload structs etc defined, and I think it's good design-wise. However what still needs a lot of work is input/output modules. Those are very much geared towards logic packets, and indeed their internal API doesn't really even allow us to extend that very well. But Uwe is planning on redoing that API in any case, I think. Uwe? - sigrok-cli is about halfway done getting reworked to handle analog packets. I'm doing all this in a branch, but haven't published it yet. I need to get it into a state where it's clean enough for other people to see first. I'll commit to pushing it onto a branch on github by the end of the week, so you can start using it as well. I want to push it to mainline as soon as the analog packet types have been proven to be sufficient for our needs. Having you use it for your MSO driver would go a long way towards that. -- Bert Vermeulen [email protected] email/xmpp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ sigrok-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
