Uwe Hermann wrote: > Will let you know if and how this improves Windows support (it > should quite a bit, I hope).
I actually think it is only a cosmetic change, although a nice one. Windows simply can not use fds, and glib goes through a lot of effort to simulate that it can. There are threads and various native constructs involved. We decided against this within libusb. The lowest common denominator for libusb is a dedicated thread (created by the caller) which calls IO event handling functions, and I'd suggest using the same design in sigrok. Not because it's what libusb does, but because it's the only really portable way. :\ //Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ sigrok-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
